1803RE: [teslafy] HDN Reports Back
- Sep 19, 2006Hi Harvey,
Frankly, I find your personal stories much more interesting and
enlightening, for example your story about "rooster" the mathematician
was a gem that kept me smiling for days...But you want to talk
about numbers now, so OK.
I've thought abit about this same problem, that of a "3 dimensional"
rotation. What got me to think about this is something called
spacial quantization, but as the idea didn't fit the physical
observations I won't bore you with the details. However, the
basic idea of a three dimensional spin follows from this
We define spin in three dimensions by a plane, and an orthogonal
axis. It follows that there are three such spins, cooresponding
to the three dimensions. This same idea can be applied to a 4
dimensional space, now with four possible spin axis and a plane
in 2 dimensions.
It's interesting to speculate on a new kind of spin, one defined
by a three dimensional volume rather than a 2 dimensional plane,
and an axis. Again there are 4 such spins, cooresponding
to the 4 dimensions, but the appearance of such a "3 spin" in our
3 dimensional world would be quite odd. Is this what you are
referring to below, or the more simple case of an ordinary spin
but with the axis being the 4th dimension?
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf
Of Harvey Norris
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 4:02 AM
Subject: RE: [teslafy] HDN Reports Back
--- Keith Nagel <knagel@...> wrote:
> Hi Harvey,This may be awhile according to the editor. He wishes
> Welcome back.
> Do keep us informed about your trials and
> tribulations with RFR,
> your stories are wonderful and most charming. I'll
> certainly consider
> buying a copy of the DVD.
to do printed captions ect. Looking to soon buy
regular sound recording eqipment to record ordinary CD
without video counterpart.
There is a thing about people. The drummer mentioned
often looking at the clock and seeing 4:44, even
waking up late at night to see the digital clock
display reading the number.
The undeniable fact is that according to flat
dimensional phasing laws a stator line delivery
sharing both sending and return currents to the delta
arrangement will be most efficient with four phases
instead of three. With three phases; 1.7 Amps delivery
from stator line to phasing load lines can split into
1 amp deliveries. Yet with 4 phase this becomes the
same effect yeilding 1 amp deliveries on phases with
only 1.4 amp delivery lines. Is this a deception or
not? Where is the arguments against it? I have surely
thought of this. The four lines each containing 1.4 A
supply total 4*1.4= 5.6 A in vs 4 A on delivery lines.
In contrast the three phase example is 1.7*3= 5.1 in
yeilding 3 A on delivery lines. If we went to 5 phases
the stator lines would contain SQ RT of 5 stator line
delivery; higher then the SQ RT 3= 1.7 A delivery
evident in three phase. The quadrature phase delivery
is based on the lowest sq rt of 2 = 1.4
Now think about three dimensional stator/ phase load
arrangements. For this purpose we might imagine a cube
or other three dimensional construct whereby each line
of the three dimensional construct represents a phase
and each corner of the imagined 3D structure is served
by a stator line. A 3D arrangement like this implies
that on minimum a stator line can serve three arms of
the load instead of merely two as exists on the flat
Now concerning the meaning of 444: how could
quadrature be placed into three dimensions as to make
it more efficient then flat plane laws can allow?
This is a more mysterious problem then is first
considered. A three dimensional rotation may not be
the answer. but rather a semblance of the same effect
can be conceptualized using 3 sets of 3 phases
arranged to chase each in three dimensional space
orthogonally on all appropriate 3D angles. This would
be a mental construct employing a geometry employing
nine different corners I would suppose.
A lot of mistakes can be made in suppositions. In the
above idea we would have to split the 360 degrees of
timing into 9 equal parts for stator delivery to the
corners. But to concieve three dimensionally as
arrangement for timing delivery upon the corners in a
harmonical matter even demands further consideration.
Similar to the construction of magic cubes, there may
be a minimal size for the first possibility to exist.
A flat plane magic square is first evident using 3,
but the same construct applied to three dimensions is
impossible using 3. It is also impossible using 4.
When the realization beset me I then knew that 8 to a
side was possible on three dimensions and I started to
map it out. But on further questioning on the matter I
was informed that it could be done with 5 to a side
which seems to be a contradiction of theory, but
nevertheless it has been proved.
Six, the duality of three is a more difficult balance
on flat plane magic number laws. But yet if we
attempted to incorporate the idea of quadrature in
three dimensions as the 444 idea seems to lead to:
only six points of stator lines leads to a 3D object
on its corners. This would then be represented as a
visible four sided pyramid setting opposite to its
mirror images with respect to both bases.
In any case the imagination of man is a grand thing:
and it is how imagination is applied to reality that
produces new conceptions. Here the concept of three
dimensional phasing arrangements is concieved of.
Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
Yahoo! Groups Links
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>