Re: Book review ratings
- From: kumquat@...
Date sent: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:06:03 -0500 (EST)
> Speaking for myself... I don't need the rankings; they seem like a lot of workNow *you* I like :-)
> for iminal gain. I actually read what you write and THAT is all the ranking I
The ranking would be a lot of work, and nobody seems to be happy with the
proposal. Any ranking system would have some measure of unfairness to some
type of book: all of the options seem to require way too much explanation.
Adding explanations, links, comparison rankings, and averages by genre just seems
to add too much admin to a load that is already almost equal to that of the
I have added rankings to about the next month worth of reviews, so I'll let them
stand. You can let me know if you change your minds, but I'm not holding my
(I might try a simplified version later.)
====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade@... slade@... rslade@...
Fuddle duddle. - Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Feb. 16, 1971
http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev or http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade