Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

REVIEW: "Galileo, Courtier", Mario Biagioli

Expand Messages
  • Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Ha
    BKGALCOU.RVW 20020601 Galileo, Courtier , Mario Biagioli, 1993, 0-226-04560-9, U$39.00 %A Mario Biagioli %C Chicago, IL 60637 %D 1993 %G
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 9, 2002
      BKGALCOU.RVW 20020601

      "Galileo, Courtier", Mario Biagioli, 1993, 0-226-04560-9, U$39.00
      %A Mario Biagioli
      %C Chicago, IL 60637
      %D 1993
      %G 0-226-04560-9
      %I University of Chicago Press
      %O U$39.00 marketing@...
      %P 402 p.
      %T "Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of

      The book looks at Galileo as both using and being shaped by the social
      structures of his day. This is interesting in view of the current
      debate about science and technology in relation to social and
      political effects. There is also an intriguing reversal of positions:
      in Galileo's day, science was subordinate to philosophy and theology
      while current thought holds that philosophy and theology are
      subordinate to science. In addition, it is fascinating to look at the
      conjectures in regard to political and unconscious censorship by the
      older scientific societies in contrast to the current "paradigmatic"
      scientific cultures.

      Chapter one examines the idea of patronage and contrasts it with the
      current grant system. The social promotion and acceptability of
      ideas, in chapter two, leads to the idea of the importance of
      "entertaining" ideas and answers in chapter three. Most of this
      discussion analyzes the political and social aspects of debate, but
      there is some overemphasis of the idea that "polite" debate helped
      establish "objective" science. Chapter four promotes the linguistic
      basis for "speciation" of groups of scientists with no recognition of
      a more likely mechanism--ego.

      An intermezzo describes the complexity of manipulations and power
      struggles in the Roman (papal) court. Chapter five seems to want to
      outline the debate over the "Assayer" paper on cometary motion as a
      fight between patrons of Grassy and Galileo, but the text does not
      prove the case. The "Dialogues" trial of 1633, chapter six attempts
      to demonstrate as a logical or even necessary outcome of courtly
      dynamics, but mostly shows it as a printing contract dispute gone
      badly wrong. This and other chapters might be more convincing with
      more details of Galileo's life. The epilogue, oddly, seems to think
      that the idea of the similarity of court patrons and scientific
      politics is radical and new.

      The book presents some interesting topics for discussion, but does not
      seem to convincingly prove the theses it promotes. It will reward the
      reader, but possibly not in the way the author intended.

      copyright Robert M. Slade, 2002 BKGALCOU.RVW 20020601

      ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
      rslade@... rslade@... slade@... p1@...
      The real problem is in the hearts and minds of men. It is not a
      problem of physics but of ethics. It is easier to denature
      plutonium than to denature the evil from the spirit of man.
      - Albert Einstein
      http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev or http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.