Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: tc-list Mark 7:24

Expand Messages
  • Jim Deardorff
    ... Etc. My eye also went straight to Mk 7:24 in N-A 27, rather than to Mk 7:31. But I hope that the 7:24 case is interesting enough to merit some comment. Jim
    Message 1 of 8 , Aug 2, 1999
      On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Jim Deardorff wrote:

      > On Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Robert B. Waltz wrote:
      > > I found this message more than a little disturbing (e.g. in its use
      > > of the Aland "Manuscript Categories," which it treats as if they
      > > were measures of manuscripts' actual *values,* when in fact they
      > > are simply descriptions of how Byzantine the manuscripts are). That
      > > being the case, I've decided simply to analyse the variant myself
      > > and ignore the rest.
      Etc.

      My eye also went straight to Mk 7:24 in N-A 27, rather than to Mk 7:31.
      But I hope that the 7:24 case is interesting enough to merit some comment.

      Jim Deardorff
    • Robert B. Waltz
      Message 2 of 8 , Aug 2, 1999
        On 8/2/99, Jim Deardorff wrote, in part:

        >This case interested me because it is a good example of where an incorrect
        >decision could easily be made on the basis of a faulty hypothesis -- that
        >of Markan priority over Matthew
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.