Re: tc-list re: barrett's response
- On 7/19/99, Perry L. Stepp wrote:
>Regarding Barret's defense of his book, Robert B. WaltzI'm not denying the right of the author to defend him/herself. On a
>>There is something this defense misses: It came from *the author of
>>the book*. Not exactly an objective source.
>I don't understand this objection. A scholar feels that his/her work has
>come under attack--a feeling that is quite justified in this particular
>case, IMHO. Said author responds by defending his/her work in the arena of
>public discourse (this forum is certainly an accepted arena for public
>discourse.) We should not cast aspersions on that defense ("not exactly an
>objective source") simply because it came from the one "being attacked,"
particularl point of fact, an author has every right to answer
But what are the odds that an author is going to be able to
objectively assess his or her work? The author will (almost) always
view things in the best possible light. So I would prefer the
opinion of an outside investigator.
Given the number of unfavorable made about this book, I still think
we need to see an outside, controlled review (not a random list
of passages) before we can assess the book.
At least, that's what *I* use reviews for. Obviously, others see
things very differently....
Robert B. Waltz
Want more loudmouthed opinions about textual criticism?
Try my web page: http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn
(A site inspired by the Encyclopedia of NT Textual Criticism)