tc-list corrections in 010
- I would be grateful for opinions as to the corrections written above
the lines in 010. I have been working with Titus (ffol. 126v-129v),
but the same sort of corrections may appear elsewhere (not in
Philemon). The letters are slightly smaller than in the main text but
seem to have the same forms. Are they the work of a second hand?
If anyone out there is at Cambridge, perhaps you could look at the
manuscript (Trinity College B.XVII.1 according to Aland) for
differences in the ink that do not show in photos.
Vinton A. Dearing
- These corrections are described (p. xxxiii),and listed and
divided between: prima manu, secunda manu (the most active), and
recenti manu (pp. 273-84) by Scrivener in_An ExactTranscript of the
This is at least the place to start an examination of them.
DR DC PARKER
READER IN NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL CRITICISM AND PALAEOGRAPHY
DEPT OF THEOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM
TEL. 0121-414 3613
FAX 0121-414 6866