Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: tc-list Phi 3.16

Expand Messages
  • Robert B. Waltz
    On Wed, 25 Nov 1998, Roderic L. Mullen ... I should offer a clarification. The comments I made (about 614 and 2412 being Byzantine)
    Message 1 of 5 , Nov 26, 1998
      On Wed, 25 Nov 1998, "Roderic L. Mullen" <rlmullen@...>

      >The cautious reader will note that I said 614 is "often considered to be a
      >secondary Western witness in Acts." The key word here is SECONDARY.

      I should offer a clarification. The comments I made (about 614 and
      2412 being Byzantine) were meant to apply *only to Paul*. On re-reading,
      I realize I didn't say that.

      In Acts and the Catholic Epistles, they are *not* Byzantine. They
      are members of Family 2138 (Amphoux's name; Wachtel's Hk-gr, etc.)
      It may be questioned whether these manuscripts are in fact "Western"
      (in the Catholics, they do *not* agree with the surviving Old Latins) --
      but that is another story.
      -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

      Robert B. Waltz
      waltzmn@...

      Want more loudmouthed opinions about textual criticism?
      Try my web page: http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn
      (A site inspired by the Encyclopedia of NT Textual Criticism)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.