Re: tc-list Quality of fragment photos
- On 9 Sep 98 at 8:56, Thomas J. Kraus wrote:
> . . . . what you may haveA quick correction: the URL is:
> already found, you´ll find any picture in the literature given under the
> following (http://www.teleport.com/~cabern/andrew/primary/grospels.html)
Dr Mark Goodacre mailto:M.S.Goodacre@...
Dept of Theology Tel: +44 (0)121 414 7512
University of Birmingham Fax: +44 (0)121 414 6866
Birmingham B15 2TT
World Without Q: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/q
> Unfortunately, I do not agree with you about the quality of the photosHallo Thomas,
> contained in Thiede=B4s and D=B4Ancona=B4s "popular bestseller" about the
> Magdalen fragments. Despite the requested and among papyrologists and
> palaeographers undisputed method of publishing a papyrus, the tiny Qumran
> fragment 7Q5 as well as the Magdalen fragments are reproduced with a deep
> blue background. But only a white background enables the observer to
> distinguish between holes in a papyrus and ink blots.
you are right on everything.
What I meant was just the quality of the photography ITSELF not its presentation (and manipulation).
About requesting photos from the British Museum, I have not much hope...
Original Message: http://www.findmail.com/list/tc-list/?start=4489
Start a FREE email list at http://www.FindMail.com/