Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Another interesting article - Author : Mr.Mani M Manivannan

Expand Messages
  • sathuragirivel@yahoo.com
    Mudaliars and Pillais Mudaliars and Pillais are both titles. Some scholars think that the title Mudaliar was given to leaders of various castes/commnities
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 3, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      Mudaliars and Pillais

      Mudaliars and Pillais are both titles. Some scholars think that the
      title Mudaliar was given to leaders of various castes/commnities
      during the Chola Empire who were responsible for collecting taxes
      from the peasants. In that sense one can compare them to the
      Zamindars who did similar work for the Mughal emperor or the various
      Nawabs, or the British Collectors who collected taxes for the British
      East India Company and later the British Empire. Apparently there
      were Mudaliars among brahmins as well as paraiyars, though a lot of
      these titles were indeed awarded to agricultural communities.

      A lot of the castes that have the Mudaliar title today seemed to have
      served the King in someway. The Agamudaiyars are said to be the
      Agambadiyars or the bodyguards of the King. The KaikkoLas and the
      Sengunthars served the Kings too. There is a saying that goes
      something like "kaLLar, maRavar, agamudaiyaar mella mella veLLaLar
      aanaar." Those three castes are primarily martial castes that served
      the King and had land grants and in peace did agricultural work.

      But it is the Saiva veLLaLars who were entitled to the posts of heads
      of Saiva Atheenams who seemed to have been really powerful. Along
      with the brahmins they had state patronage, usually were
      administrators of the Saiva temples that dot the Tamil country as
      well as the lands that were associated with these temples. It is this
      group that was powerful in Sri Lanka.

      Some schloars think that the veLLaLas allied with the Tamil brahmins
      to eradicate the Jain/Buddhist inflence over the Tamil country. This
      alliance lasted until the Vijaya Nagar empire extended its influence
      over Tamil Nadu. It appears that the Vijaya Nagar strategists
      successfully persuaded the Tamil brahmins to ally with
      the "nationalistic" Hindus and look past the Tamil country. These
      scholars believe that schism between these two dominant Tamil castes
      started to develop around that time.

      During the early part of the 20th century, both of these castes were
      vying with each other for power, though even then some prominent
      leaders of both these castes did come together in the Congress party.
      The Justice party was at first dominated by the veLLaLas, Tamil as
      well as other Dravidian agricultural castes. Even the D.K. and later
      D.M.K. managed to retain the loyalties of significant portion of the
      veLLaLas for a long time. But independence and the powerful movements
      of the backward castes within and out of the D.M.K. started to erode
      the power of both these castes. While at the turn of 20th century a
      significant portion of the land owners were either brahmins or
      veLLaLas, at the end of the 20th century very few of them owned any
      agricultural property.

      Almost all of the battles between brahmins and high caste veLLaLas on
      the one hand and the backward castes on the other are now being
      replayed as battles between the current land owning castes and the
      dalit farm hands.

      Mr. A. C. Shunmugam appears to be a small fry who is trying to make
      some noise to get some attention and possibly divide the Mudaliar
      vote bank in the northern districts. But even in the best of times,
      the orthodox veLLaLas were loyal Congress supporters while the
      relatively backward, non land-owning Mudaliars tended to ally with
      the DMK.

      As for non-Tamil origin of the Tuluva veLLaLa mudaliars, your Tamil
      teacher was probably interpreting the word "TuLuva" as those from the
      TuLu country. It appears that tuLuva veLLaLars are predominantly
      found in the ThoNdai mandalam (Chennai, Chengalpattu, vada aarkkaadu
      districts) as well as the South Karnataka and Southern Andhra Pradesh
      regions.

      Except for that name there is nothing much that differentiates them
      from other veLLaLa mudaliars. It is doubtful that they really are of
      Tulu origin since there aren't any TuLu speakers among them nor do
      they have any marital alliances with any TuLu castes.

      Those in Tamil Nadu can probably provide more details. I vaguely
      recall seeing a book on the History of veLLaLas by maRaimalai adigaL,
      who belonged to the PiLLai caste. Other prominent mudaliars and
      piLLais of 20th century include V. Vu. Chithambaram PiLLai, Drs. A.
      Ramasamy and Lakshmanasamy mudaliars, Thiru. Vi. Kaliyanasundara
      Mudaliar, Mu. Varatharasnaar and M. Bhakthavathchalam. While the
      Mudaliar party now claims the former Chief Minister C. N. Annadurai
      as a mudaliar, while he was alive, his subcaste was not recognized as
      a Mudaliar caste by the orthodox. In fact, some of C.N.A.'s
      propaganda plays were notorious for their acidic attacks on the
      Mudaliar paNNaiyaars. Sivaji Ganesan and M. R. Radha used to play
      delicious Mudaliar villain roles. The Mudaliar establishment was as
      shocked as the brahmin establishment when the D.M.K. was swept to
      power and Anna became chief minister. However, Anna did carry the
      votes of poor mudaliars in addition to the Rajaji led brahmins along
      with the rest of Tamil Nadu.

      Most of the information in this post needs to be cross-checked
      against authoritative references that I don't have. I am hoping that
      scholars with access to such works in Tamil Nadu will correct the
      mistakes in my post and provide more details. For details on the
      veLLaLa-brahmin alliance, see the archives of the Indology list.

      by Mr.Mani.M.Manivannan
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.