Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
Advanced Search
Author
Subject
Message
Special notice only

1,031 results from messages in synoptic-l

Advanced Search
  • ...retain credibility. This book is, very simply, required reading for anyone interested in Q. Period. Thank you again Mark, and peace, Brian Trafford Calgary, AB, Canada MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here Synoptic-L Homepage: http...
    Brian Trafford Sep 20, 2002
  • ...decisively as Davies, Allison and Goodacre seem to believe). But other respected scholars, notably William Farmer, Thomas Longstaff, Brian Wilson (in his own typically indiosyncratic way), and a good many others did not (or do not) find such arguments compelling, and...
    Brian Trafford Sep 17, 2002
  • ...and probability of, such an order (i.e. Matt>Luke>Mark) seems less likely than is Marcan priority within the Synoptics. Peace, Brian Trafford Calgary, AB, Canada Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here Synoptic-L Homepage: http...
    Brian Trafford May 28, 2002
  • Fetching Sponsored Content...
  • >This form of reasoning seems to me somewhat problematic. Brian Trafford is unwilling to accept the hypothesis that Luke used Matthew (or vice versa) because that...did not address the points you raised in my original post. Thank you for your reply, and be well. Brian Trafford Calgary, AB, Canada P.S. As I am not a doctor please call me Brian in the future, though...
    Brian Trafford May 27, 2002
  • --- In synoptic-l@y..., "Ron Price" < ron.price@v...> wrote: > Brian Trafford wrote: > > >Quite frankly, I do not see why a proponent of the 2DH bears any kind of a...source, I will continue to agree with Meier, and remind myself of his caution regarding Q. Peace, Brian Trafford Calgary, AB, Canada Every morning the exegetes should repeat, "Q is a hypothetical document...
    Brian Trafford May 24, 2002
  • ...languages? Was any of it preserved at least partially in oral traditions prior to Matt and Luke writing them down? Who can say? Brian Wilson, for one, believed that virtually everything contained in *all three* of the Synoptics was contained in a pre-existing written...
    Brian Trafford May 23, 2002
  • ...them when I read them to him on his final evening yesterday. Once again, thank you all for enriching his life. Peter. In message , Brian E. Wilson writes > >Dear List Readers, > >I'm posting now after many years of silently enjoying observing the >list. My father...
    Brian E. Wilson Feb 23, 2002
  • Dear List Readers, I'm posting now after many years of silently enjoying observing the list. My father, who has been coping with cancer for many years, has now been diagnosed with a new terminal secondary cancer. He is still reading printouts of these messages in hospital and, when he has the energy, he dictates replies with his usual vigour. However, the illness is likely to take...
    Brian E. Wilson Feb 21, 2002
  • ...date, you appear to have accepted it as a logical possibility, but rejected without further argument or example. Peter Wilson pp Brian Wilson >I would suggest that 202-102 is the result of Mt and Lk depending on the >same >documentary source (whatever that may have...
    Brian E. Wilson Feb 21, 2002
  • ...All the results can be accounted for similarly, without positing any particular synoptic documentary hypothesis. Best wishes, BRIAN WILSON - Brian E. Wilson Problems and new results Stephen Carlson asks -- Why is there a 202-102, but no 002-102 or 201-102? Stephen...
    Brian E. Wilson Feb 20, 2002