Thank you very much. I am, of course, aware of the problems of working with
reconstructions - and I shall read your article with interest - I was
getting at narratological ideas associated with the reception of any
harmony, really. The very concept of point of view when the author is
consciously melding his/her sources is something I am trying to get my mind
around, without much success at present.
One of the reasons I raised it on this forum concerns the activity of the
evangelists in a kind of pre-redaction criticism understanding. Without
wanting to muddy the waters of authorial intention, I am wanting to look at
what the author of Matthew, say, was doing with the Christology of Mark as a
kind of sequel (or vice versa for the non-Markan prioritists), rather than a
major theological project.
All this in some work on film narratology. Yojimbo and Sanjuro anyone?
Thanks for your help,
Dr Bridget Gilfillan Upton
Lecturer in New Testament
University of London
London W8 5HQ
Tel. 0044 (0)20 7795 4214 (direct)
Fax. 0044 (0)20 7795 4200 (college)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Head" <pmh15@...>
To: "Bridget Gilfillan Upton" <b.gilfillan-upton@...>;
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Synoptic-L] Diatessaron
> The real problem is that the Diatessaron is no longer extant, so it has to
> be reconstructed before a narrative critical approach could work AND the
> really technical studies focus more on relatively isolated material that
> can be proven to be diatessaronic rather than (in general) the broader
> narrative things. You could get round this by working only with the Arabic
> (but that is pretty problematic) or only with a Greek reconstruction (e.g.
> Zahn), or even with what can be reconstructed from Ephraem's commentary on
> the Syriac Diatessaron. But you've got problems whichever way you look at
> it. Check W. Peterson's book.
> Some time ago I did attempt to probe one aspect of the
> authorial/narratorial point of view in
> TATIAN'S CHRISTOLOGY AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE
> DIATESSARON Tyndale Bulletin 43.1(1992)121-137
> At 03:08 PM 12/1/04, Bridget Gilfillan Upton wrote:
>>I am not sure whether this is the forum to ask this on, but I wonder if
>>anyone knows of a study of the Diatessaron using a narrative critical
>>approach. I am working on the four gospel tradition as a kind of reception
>>unit, and thought the Diatessaron might be interesting too, in terms of
>>whether there can legitimately be an implied author, and a narratorial
>>point of view, for a harmony.
>>I should be grateful for any ideas on this whole area.
>>Bridget Gilfillan Upton
>>Dr Bridget Gilfillan Upton
>>Lecturer in New Testament
>>University of London
>>London W8 5HQ
>>Tel. 0044 (0)20 7795 4214 (direct)
>>Fax. 0044 (0)20 7795 4200 (college)
>>Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
>>List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
> Peter M. Head, PhD
> Sir Kirby Laing Senior Lecturer in New Testament
> Tyndale House
> 36 Selwyn Gardens Phone: (UK) 01223
> Cambridge, CB3 9BA Fax: (UK) 01223
> Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
> List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...