Re: How Luke used Matthew and Mark
- I made a bad blooper below, where "Luke" should have read "John."
At 06:13 PM 2/20/98 -0800, Jim Deardorff wrote, in response to Antonio:
>My other research has shown me that the writer of Luke [make it John] hadhad some brief
>access (apparently reading access but not transcribing or copying access) toLogia). Examples are
>the same source that formed the basis of Matthew (which I've >called the
>the episode of Jesus' appearance on the shore when he directed the disciplesthe writer of
>where to make the huge catch of fish (though this was heavily >redacted by
>John), and the mention of Judas being the son of SimonJim Deardorff
>Iscariot. The writer of Luke had a little more access to the >Logia, after
>the writer of Matthew was done with it, but used the episode of
>the miraculous catch of fish in a different context. These two >evangelists I
>regard as the "others" within the quote from Papias regarding >Matthew, that
>"each interpreted them [the Logia] as best he could."