On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:57 AM, Karel Hanhart wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen C. Carlson" <scarlson@...>
>> Burridge ably filled in for Bauckham in a SBL 2003 session on this
>> topic. As I recall, one of his points is that the gospels are a
>> form about biography, which means that they are about its subject
>> Jesus, not about the local community from which they originated.
> The stringent remark "not about the local community" cannot be
> in my view.
> This is not written to downgrade Burridge's work in comparative
> All fields ought to be explored. But we should consider the main Judean
> features of the Gospels first before we compare the gospels with
> andres' stories.
Hence, the appendix explaining why the absence of Judean Biographies (I
suppose Philo's work doesn't count) makes the Greco-Roman context
preferred. This is only one of the several holes I see in Burridge's
seminal work, holes which a growing consensus Gospel scholars seem
willing to overlook.
This is why I'm anxious to see the reworking of his text, and the
extent to which he has answered some weaknesses. Why not til September?
Doesn't he know I have a dissertation to write!!!
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...