Re: [Synoptic-L] Added a page to my site, an alternative to the 3SH
- Dave Gentile wrote:
> .....the fact that we don't have thoseDave,
> hypothetical early versions of Luke certainly is an argument against the
> idea. I think we would have to speculate that "a copy of record" somewhere
> was made to look more like Matthew, and that all existing copies descend
> from that copy. In addition to an early substantial change, there may have
> been other minor changes in the same direction. Earlier versions of Luke
> may not have been widely distributed, and in fact might have been actively
> destroyed by proto-orthodox believers, if the original Luke contained
> material that did not sit well with their view.
But, as I tried to indicate in my previous posting, I can identify fairly
closely what the author of Luke wrote, and can therefore rule out any "early
substantial change(s)" of the sort you mention.
Web site: http://homepage.virgin.net/ron.price/index.htm
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...