Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [Synoptic-L] Added a page to my site, an alternative to the 3SH

Expand Messages
  • Ron Price
    ... Dave, But, as I tried to indicate in my previous posting, I can identify fairly closely what the author of Luke wrote, and can therefore rule out any
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 3, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Dave Gentile wrote:

      > .....the fact that we don't have those
      > hypothetical early versions of Luke certainly is an argument against the
      > idea. I think we would have to speculate that "a copy of record" somewhere
      > was made to look more like Matthew, and that all existing copies descend
      > from that copy. In addition to an early substantial change, there may have
      > been other minor changes in the same direction. Earlier versions of Luke
      > may not have been widely distributed, and in fact might have been actively
      > destroyed by proto-orthodox believers, if the original Luke contained
      > material that did not sit well with their view.

      Dave,

      But, as I tried to indicate in my previous posting, I can identify fairly
      closely what the author of Luke wrote, and can therefore rule out any "early
      substantial change(s)" of the sort you mention.

      Ron Price

      Derbyshire, UK

      Web site: http://homepage.virgin.net/ron.price/index.htm


      Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
      List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.