Re: [Synoptic-L] Accounting for the minor agreements
- David Gentile wrote (in defence of his theory which posits two lost
>There are certainly records of "lost gospels"Dave,
A generalized claim like this is not as convincing as a record of a
specific writing which can be linked with the posited document.
>Why [did Luke] leave out the "inside/outside the cup" discussion? (Mk7:18 / Mt 15:15)
He intended to cover the topic in 11:37ff. According to Goulder there
are clear echoes of Mark 7 in 11:37ff.
> ..... In the Mark/Q overlap there is no major Mark/Luke agreementI don't know what you count as "major". How about Mk 4:21 // Lk 8:16
> against Matthew. (I would explain the minor ones as
>alterations made by Matthew to features present in both sources.)
with no Matthean equivalent in his redaction of Mark?
Weston-on-Trent, Derby, UK
Web site: http://homepage.virgin.net/ron.price/index.htm
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...