[Synoptic-L] probability + lukan style
> Emmanuel Fritsch wrote:John Rutledge asks :
> > The probability of such a distribution in random
> > condition would be inferior to 0.12. Even if you
> > rebuke (4), that Boismard does not explicitly
> > present as a markan hapax, your propability
> > remains inferior to 0.19. This is not an
> > incontrovertible evidence, but a good incitation
> > to go further.
>Classical formula of probability. the probability of
> How exactly did you calculate these numbers?
finding 0, 1, 7 or 8 elements when 8 elements fall
independantly with a constant probability. I send next
week a private explanation with excel files for who wants.
Send me a private mail if you are interested. (John,
you are directly included ;-).
> I performed a random check on a number of wordsNot I. Boismard.
> throughout Mark. Most are not nearly as non-Markan nor
> as Lukan as the examples in Mark 5:1-20. It's kind of
> interesting -- you may be on to something.
"L'Évangile de Marc, sa préhistoire" pp 30ff
M.-É. Boismard - 1994 - Gabalda, Paris,
> If theLooks hard to define it for computer (just see : the ONOMA MOI,
> criteria for determining "style" based on word usage
> could be refined a bit, it would be quite simple to
> write a program to calculate the relative style
> correspondence of pericopes throughout the New
DIHGHSANTO POS, PANTES + EQAUM : all of this is difficult to
Lamouille found a large set of Lukan-style elements, and
with Boismard, they defined and classified them quite
striclty, but the definition of Boismard in his work
on Mark is less restrictive, and so his own set looks
I forget the references of Lamouille list. Probably :
"Les Actes des deux apôtres"
M.-É. Boismard, A. Lamouille et Justin Taylor - 1990- Gabalda, Paris
But perhabs the previous one, on the Occid. version.
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...