[Synoptic-L] Goulder's position lost.
Mark Goodacre wrote:
I am aware that adherents of the Griesbach
hypothesis take this view, but as I understand their position on the
Minor Agreements, it is directed against the Two-Source Theory
and its key assumption that Matthew and Luke redacted Mark
independently of one another. Is that the way you are using the
Is there any other way?
If so, how would you react to someone like Michael
Goulder who would strongly maintain Marcan Priority but who also
believes that the Minor Agreements call into question the
independence of Matthew and Luke?
Why don't you give what you consider Goulder's or your best iron-clad
argument with all the required details and points of it and I'll respond.
Cordially in Christ,
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...