Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

[Synoptic-L] Goulder's position lost.

Expand Messages
  • John Lupia
    Synoptic-L@bham.ac.uk Mark Goodacre wrote: I am aware that adherents of the Griesbach hypothesis take this view, but as I understand their position on the
    Message 1 of 2 , Jul 6, 2001
      Synoptic-L@...

      Mark Goodacre wrote:


      I am aware that adherents of the Griesbach
      hypothesis take this view, but as I understand their position on the
      Minor Agreements, it is directed against the Two-Source Theory
      and its key assumption that Matthew and Luke redacted Mark
      independently of one another. Is that the way you are using the
      argument?


      Is there any other way?


      If so, how would you react to someone like Michael
      Goulder who would strongly maintain Marcan Priority but who also
      believes that the Minor Agreements call into question the
      independence of Matthew and Luke?


      Why don't you give what you consider Goulder's or your best iron-clad
      argument with all the required details and points of it and I'll respond.

      Cordially in Christ,
      John





      _______________________________________________________
      Send a cool gift with your E-Card
      http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/



      Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
      List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
    • John Lupia
      Synoptic-L@bham.ac.uk Mark Goodacre wrote: I am aware that adherents of the Griesbach hypothesis take this view, but as I understand their position on the
      Message 2 of 2 , Jul 6, 2001
        Synoptic-L@...

        Mark Goodacre wrote:


        I am aware that adherents of the Griesbach
        hypothesis take this view, but as I understand their position on the
        Minor Agreements, it is directed against the Two-Source Theory
        and its key assumption that Matthew and Luke redacted Mark
        independently of one another. Is that the way you are using the
        argument?


        Is there any other way?


        If so, how would you react to someone like Michael
        Goulder who would strongly maintain Marcan Priority but who also
        believes that the Minor Agreements call into question the
        independence of Matthew and Luke?


        Why don't you give what you consider Goulder's or your best iron-clad
        argument with all the required details and points of it and I'll respond.

        Cordially in Christ,
        John





        _______________________________________________________
        Send a cool gift with your E-Card
        http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/



        Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
        List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.