Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Blessed are the Peacemakers

Expand Messages
  • Richard H. Anderson
    A continuation of the discussion on Jeffrey s article. Two have commented that the single reference to EIRHNOPOIS could not be central to Matthew s theme. I do
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 28, 1998
    • 0 Attachment
      A continuation of the discussion on Jeffrey's article.

      Two have commented that the single reference to EIRHNOPOIS could not be
      central to Matthew's theme.
      I do not doubt that the story was so well known, probably memorized in
      toto by all of the earliest followers, that in Matthew's telling, the
      introduction of a radical new description could be cental to Matthew.
      [Note this word does not appear in Moulton and Milligan.] But does this
      mean Mark, Luke and John reject this view. Are there any variant
      readings of verses other than Matt 5:9 containing eirhnopois? It is one
      thing to advocate non-violence and to be non-violent [certainly this
      tradition is present in all the gospels] but to advocate being a
      peacemaker is truly radical! How radical is illustrated by the naming
      of the missile with the capacity to carry the most nuclear warheads the
      Peacemaker! The best explanation for its absence in the other gospels is
      to say that it was not so important when they were published [perhaps
      pre-destruction of the Temple and the war with Rome to be a peacemaker
      as it was post 70 C.E.] as when Matthew was published. Jeffrey, should
      not the significance of only Matthew using this terminology be part of
      the article, if in fact this is a central theme?
      But does Matthew with his heightened polemics against the Jews agree
      with the importance of being a peacemaker?
      Richard H. Anderson
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.