[Synoptic-L] My hypothesis (or at least very close) in print
- I just noticed in Kloppenburg's "Excavating Q" on p.46 in footnote 58 he
mentions Boismard 1972. This simplified version of Boismard is almost
exactly the same as my idea. I would just make Luke dependent on "B" (the
source for Mark) instead of Mark. and say that "A" and "B" must also be
As stated, the hypothesis reads:
Q + Mt1 + Mark => Luke
Q + Mt1 + Mark => Mt2
A => Mt1
A => Mk
B => Mk
It's nice to see that somebody else saw it basicly the same way.
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...