In a message dated 12/3/2000 9:20:18 AM Eastern Standard Time,
<< << the softening or omission of bold Markan statements, and
the vivid character of Mark's Story,>>
[same comment as above: why is it impossible that relatively "bold" and
"vivid" writing is more primitive compared to less bold and vivid prose?]>>
I meant to write: why is it thought necessary that relatively bold and vivid
writing is more primitive compared to less bold and vivid prose?
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...