Re: [Synoptic-L] The Critical Edition of Q
- View SourceAt 09:20 AM 11/24/00 -0600, Steven Craig Miller wrote:
>To: Stephen C. Carlson,...
><< If, however, you are looking for what a large group of scholars thinks
>is in Q, then this is the right book. >>
>The IQPI too didn't like this omission from a book of its heft. If you are
>reconstruction is the collaboration of over 40 scholars, edited by James M.
>Robinson, Paul Hoffmann, and John S. Kloppenborg. There is no commentary
>presented, not even on how they reached their decision, although
>occasionally a few notes are added.
interested into understanding why they reached the decisions they
did (as opposed to knowing merely what their decisions were), then
you'd have to go their DOCUMENTA Q series, which is quite detailed
At 03:43 PM 11/24/00 -0000, Dr Mark Goodacre wrote:
>One thing that is a little disappointing aboutI would agree with this. Ironically, this omission and their
>the volume is that there is no place where *just* the Greek
>text is printed continuously, i.e. without the synopsis, so you
>have to turn over page after page just to read one pericope.
concomittant decision to spread Q throughout the entire volume
make it more difficult to study Q as a *document* in its own
right. Rather, the Q of the CEQ remains merely a source of
of Matthew's and Luke's wording. I guess it was premature to
announce Q's graduation from source to gospel.
Stephen C. Carlson mailto:scarlson@...
Synoptic Problem Home Page http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/synopt/
"Poetry speaks of aspirations, and songs chant the words." Shujing 2.35
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...