Kyle Dillon wrote:
> Sorry to bombard you with so many questions, but I think this is a
> very interesting bit of information.
Yes, they are; but if you search the archives of Synoptic-L you will
many of them were discussed in detain in recent months.
As to your question of how and why the early church fathers could have
wrong about Matthew having originally been written in Hebrew (if that is
what Papias EBRAIDI DIALEKTW actually means, which is by no means
especially in the light of the fact that canonical Matthew shows little
signs of being translation Greek, see R.T. France, _Matthew: Evangelist
Teacher (Paternoster, 1989) 50-66, esp. 61-66.
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626