Re: [Synoptic-L] Re: The Critical Edition of Q
> From: Maluflen@...of
> To: Synoptic-L@...
> Subject: Re: [Synoptic-L] Re: The Critical Edition of Q
> Date: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 4:10 PM
> In a message dated 5/2/2000 3:17:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> yuku@... writes:
> << You may recall
> that I recently posted a long post where I demonstrated that in the case
> the anointing scene Lk seems to preserve the earliest version. Hardlyseems
> like this derived from Mk/Mt >>more
> I recall your attempt to demonstrate this point, but I also recall being
> than usually unimpressed by the validity of your argument. You ignore,for
> one thing, the arguments of scholars that show this story to besecondarily
> adapted by Luke to serve as an illustration of his theology offorgiveness of
> sins by Jesus predicted by John the Baptist, who, in Luke's view (contrahimself)
> Matt) shows John preaching a baptism of repentance (administered by
> unto (eis) the remission of sins (effected by Jesus) (see the setting ofthe
> story of the woman-sinner in Lk 7).both).
> By the way, this alternative view of the history of this story reveals a
> serious ambiguity in your final statement and what it is taken to imply:
> "Hardly seems like this derived from Mk/Mt". You apparently conclude from
> this that Luke's version must have preceded Matthew's (or Mark's, or
> This does not necessarily follow at all. A later version, dependent forother
> substance on an earlier version, can very well nevertheless seem, in
> respects, not to "derive" from the earlier one.Yes, Leonard, it can, but generally, as you must admit, a later version,
dependent for substance on an earlier version, does betray its derivation
from the earlier one.
> It all depends on howjudgment,
> creative an author is at work with the material in question. In my
> the story of the woman as told in Lk 7 clearly reflects a theology ofwith
> forgiveness of sins through the agency of Jesus that marks it, together
> many other passages of Lk and Acts, as secondary to the Gospel of Matthewat
> least, and contemporary with the redactive activity of Luke himself.So you think this story is secondarily adapted by Luke to serve as an
illustration of his theology of forgiveness of sins by Jesus predicted by
John the Baptist?
Well, Leonard, lots of things are possible, but are they probable? After
all, it's also possible that Boston in England derived its name from
Besides, is your counter-proposal really falsifiable, in the Popperian
sense? How would one falsify your theory? In other words, how would one set
about disproving that this story is secondarily adapted by Luke to serve as
an illustration of his theology of forgiveness of sins by Jesus predicted
by John the Baptist?
Let me remind you that those theories that are not falsifiable are
generally not considered scientific.
And you have the following points still to deal with,
- anointing seems like an intrusion in the text of Mt/Mk
- this scene contains some clearly late features in Mt/Mk
And you're not even beginning to deal with all the issues associated with
the Pepysian Gospels as yet.
Yuri Kuchinsky | Toronto | http://www.trends.ca/~yuku/bbl/bbl.htm
Biblical history list http://www.egroups.com/group/loisy - unmoderated
The goal proposed by Cynic philosophy is apathy, which is
equivalent to becoming God -=O=- Julian