Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Matt. 6:10a/Lk. 11:2c (fwd)

Expand Messages
  • Jeffrey Gibson
    ... Bob, I have to beg off an immediate reply to your questions here - or at least to the one regarding how the forgiveness petition fits in with my general
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 2, 1998
    • 0 Attachment
      On Sun, 1 Mar 1998, Bob Schacht wrote:

      > At 01:00 PM 2/28/98 -0600, Jeffrey Gibson wrote:
      > >First, to say that the petition is a plea for God to usher in his kingdom
      > >implies that, at the time the prayer was given, God was believed (by
      > >Jesus, no less!) not yet to have done so, that the kingdom was in no sense
      > >a present reality, and that there was some doubt about God's desire to
      > >establish his sovereignty at all. But how then do we reconcile this with
      > >the fact that Jesus, at all levels of the tradition, proclaims and is
      > >certain that the kingdom has arrived? ...
      > This is an interesting point, and with your other points you make enough of
      > a case to merit attention.
      > Meanwhile, I can't wait for you to get to Matt. 6:12//Luke 11:4--
      > Mt6:12NRSV: And forgive us our debts ... debtors
      > REB: Forgive us the wrong we have done... wronged us
      > Lk11:4NRSV: And forgive us our sins ... indebted to us
      > REB: And forgive us our sins ... done us wrong
      > Could you unravel this for me? Sins? Debts? Wrongs? Trespasses? What do you
      > construe Jesus to have said/mean here, if this does indeed go back to the
      > historical Jesus?


      I have to beg off an immediate reply to your questions here - or at least
      to the one regarding how the "forgiveness" petition fits in with my
      general thesis - because I haven't yet given any concerted thought to this
      petition other than to wonder whether the way Luke sets it out (forgive us
      ... *since* we have forgiven ...) is more original than the Matthean
      version (forgive ... *as* we forgive...). All I can say right now is that
      I have an intuition that there is a link here with Jesus' declaration that
      the essence of "Sonship" is found in a willingness to love the enemy, and
      that therefore what is being asked of God is that he regard the community
      which has indeed followed (or is willing to follow, so Matt.) the covenant
      obligations given to them as faithful to his demands. In other words, I'm
      not sure that it is a confession of sinfulness so much as it is a
      declaration of intent to be faithful to the requirements of Sonship.

      As to the debt/sins question, there needn't be a radical disjunction
      between the two terms, since "debt" seems to have been a synonym for
      "sins" (i.e., breach of covenant fidelity) in the Judaism of Jesus' day (so
      Moore, Abrahams, and many others).

      And whether the petition goes back to Jesus? I think it does. In any
      case, you'll find a (I think) well thought out defense of this position
      in Meier's _Marginal Jew_ Vol. 2, p. 355, though I can't agree
      with how he interprets what Jesus meant by it.

      But what does the rest of the list think?

      More later.


      Jeffrey Gibson
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.