Last week Mark Goodacre commented in his weblog about
the question of Matthean Posteriority posed on Deinde
by Danny Zacharias and gave him some preliminary
A more comprehensive bibliography will also include a
couple of articles by W. Lockton:
"The Origin of the Gospels," Church Quarterly Review
Certain Alleged Gospel Sources: A study of Q, Proto
Luke and M (London: Longmans, Green, 1927).
An unfortunate omission from most bibliographies on
Matthean Posteriority is:
Ernst von Dobschütz, Matthäus als Rabbi und
Katechet, published in Zeitschrift für die
neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der
älteren Kirche (ZNW) 27 (1928), 338-48, later
translated by Robert Morgan, "Matthew as Rabbi and
Catechist," in The Interpretation of Matthew, ed.
Graham Stanton (London: SPCK, 1983), 19-29.
My German is virtually non-existent but it seems that
the following article by Aurelius argues for Mts use
of Lk. Im unsure, however, whether it advocates
putting Mt last:
Erik Aurelius, Gottesvolk und Außenseiter: Eine
geheime Beziehung Lukas Matthäus, NTS (2001),
Has anyone read this article or might be able to
enlighten me as to its proposed source theory?
I merely have an automated translation of the
article's abstract, indicating that Lukan Sondergut
(Lk 4:257) has supposedly affected Mt 8:5-13 &
Timothy M. Lewis
Cranbourne, VIC 3977
Part-time Greek Tutor at Whitley College,
Melbourne College of Divinity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...