9768Re: [Synoptic-L] Jesus' Baptism
- Jun 2, 2004Emmanuel,I did not say that I thought the baptism concept was late. To the contrary I believe it is amongst the earliest, perhaps even pre-Christian, concepts. I concur with Poirier's point about Luke 12:50, as example for Luke's concept of the Baptism.Rather I simply think - and this is what I stated - the concept that it was John who baptized Jesus was later, though not so late. The details and explanation of John's relationship to and "why-ness" of his baptizing Jesus, as spelled out in Matthew and John, that I think is a somewhat later development. It specifically answers theological questions that arose from the formula we see introduced (as) in Mark.Hum. Say a little and you almost have to say more than you want.- Stuart
Emmanuel Fritsch <emmanuel.fritsch@...> wrote:
My point of view :
** Baptism was a rite of first christians
** It was common to another religious group from which it was inspired (the
group of John's disciple)
** Jesus was at the beginning a follower of John, and had been baptised
** The previous fact was known either by christians and John's
followers, and John's
followers were using it in a theological way, arguing that John was
greater than Jesus
** Chrristians produced the account of Jesus baptism in order to answer
** The whyness is in the christian character given to John (the voice,
the prophet, etc.)
** The whyness is not perfect because the situation was not perfect for
in their debating with John's followers. Resurection was for them
As a corollary, I think, in opposition to Stuart Waugh, that baptism is a
quite early stage (which look coherent with its large presence in gospels).
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>