Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

6665Re: [Synoptic-L] are all parallelism phenomena bound to support the 2DH?

Expand Messages
  • Tim Reynolds
    Sep 6, 2001
      I'm not defining. See previous posting.

      tim

      "Brian E. Wilson" wrote:
      >
      > Brian Wilson wrote --
      > >
      > >B. H. Streeter stated that the synoptic problem is to account for the
      > >parallelism between the synoptic gospels, that is, for the observed
      > >similarities and differences of wording (including similarity of order
      > >[snip]) between the synoptic gospels.
      > >
      >
      > Tim Reynolds replied --
      >
      > >
      > >How about: "... the synoptic problem is to account for the fact that
      > >the language is too similar to be unrelated and too different to be
      > >copying."
      > >
      >
      > Tim,
      > It seems to me that your definition does not take into account
      > similarities between the synoptic gospels that are not parallelism. What
      > about the similarities between the synoptic gospels other than
      > similarities of language (or order of these similarities)?
      >
      > Best wishes,
      > BRIAN WILSON
      >
      > >HOMEPAGE *** RECENTLY UPDATED *** http://www.twonh.demon.co.uk/
      >
      > Rev B.E.Wilson,10 York Close,Godmanchester,Huntingdon,Cambs,PE29 2EB,UK
      > > "What can be said at all can be said clearly; and whereof one cannot
      > > speak thereof one must be silent." Ludwig Wittgenstein, "Tractatus".
      > _
      >
      > Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
      > List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...

      Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
      List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
    • Show all 11 messages in this topic