6651Re: [Synoptic-L] are all parallelism phenomena bound to support the 2DH?
- Sep 4, 2001
> Thomas R. W. Longstaff wrote - and Brian answered :My first question is : what are the evidence ?
> >I agree that the problem with many of the hypotheses offered to
> >"solve" the synoptic problem is that they are limited to what is
> >consistent with the evidence rather than what is most probable given
> >the evidence.
> I think the basic difficulty is to find a hypothesis that is
> consistent with all the evidence. [...]
May you provide a list of evidence ? Do you think your
list would be exhaustive, or at least, would be accepted
by a majority of scholar ?
For instance I think that Boismard would propose the Lukanian
wording in Mark as an evidence for the list. And if I well
understood, you disagree...
As another example, I think to your parallel discussion
with Tim Reynolds, where you diverge on definition of
Synoptic-L Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/synoptic-l
List Owner: Synoptic-L-Owner@...
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>