172non-Markan material in Matthew and Luke
- Mar 9, 1998J. S. Kloppenborg wrote (SNIP) -
> Given (a) Markan priority to Matthew and Luke, and (b) the non-Is it not the case that all the agreements of wording of Matthew and
>dependence of Matt on Luke and Luke on Matt, one is required to posit a
>source upon which Matt and Luke depend for their nonMarkan material.
Luke against Mark are non-Markan material? Do not these include the
minor agreements which occur throughout the triple tradition? And do
they not also include the stronger agreements of Matthew and Luke
against Mark in those pieces of triple tradition material which
advocates of the 2DH regard as "Mark-Q Overlaps" - for instance the
Parable of the Mustard Seed in Mt 13:31-32, Mk 4:30-32, Lk 13:18-19 ?
It would seem to me that if so, to posit a source upon which Matthew and
Luke depend for all their non-Markan material one would therefore have
to posit a source which included much material found in the triple
In other words, would not the source one would be required to posit
have to contain a lot of material very similar (though not identical) in
wording to much material in Mark, some of this including the hundreds
of words of the minor agreements, and some including the agreements in
wording of Matthew and Luke against Mark found in some of the material
known as "Mark-Q Overlaps"?
In which case, would one be positing 'Q' ? And if not, why not, please?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>