167Re: Q yes or no?
- Mar 7, 1998Another minor quibble -
> > ... if the Two Document Hypothesis is ruled out, Q did not exist.Kloppenborg replies:
> Tautologous! Since the ``Two Documents'' of the 2dH are Mark and Q, itNot exactly. If not-2DH, then all we know is that either not-Mark or
> follows that if not 2DH (Mark, Q), then not Mark, Q!
not-Q (or both). Only by assuming (or arguing) that Matt-Lukan
dependence on Mark (not merely the "priority" of Mark) must be true, can
we conclude that not-Q.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>