Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Formal comments [CORRECTION] (was:Re: [svg-developers] Re: Animated instances (was: Animation and begin=mouseover in )

Expand Messages
  • fruc13
    Hi Dean and Chris I am happy to see that you are not ignoring me, so I will be more cool with the next comments of the spec and try to get some feedback on the
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 1, 2002
      Hi Dean and Chris

      I am happy to see that you are not ignoring me, so I will be more
      cool with the next comments of the spec and try to get some feedback
      on the svg-developers list.

      Regards
      IzI

      --- In svg-developers@y..., Dean Jackson <dean@w...> wrote:
      > The comments list is svg-comments@w...
      > (not www-svg-comments@w...). The messages
      > are only available to W3C members.
      >
      > The public mail list is www-svg@w...
      > This is a public list with archives. Only
      > subscribers can post.
      >
      > You can post to either, but we prefer www-svg@w...
      > so that the rest of the public can see the comments
      > and discussion.
      >
      > It's possible that we will make public our response
      > to all last call comments, but this is not decided yet.
      >
      > Dean
      >
      >
      > Chris Lilley wrote:
      > > On Friday, March 01, 2002, 1:24:49 PM, fruc13 wrote:
      > >
      > > f> I proposed them add an xlink:actuate attribute at least to the
      image
      > > f> element, this would enable an image to begin loading after an
      event
      > > f> and not always at the beginning of the main svg. This would
      enable
      > > f> sequential downloading of animated images, so that the first
      part of
      > > f> the animation would load faster.
      > >
      > > Yes, we read that.
      > >
      > > f> iztok jeras
      > > f> www.rattus.info
      > >
      > > f> P.S.: About formal comments, I send comments to www-svg@w...
      > >
      > > That is a discussion list, not a comment drop-box. (btw its
      @...)
      > >
      > > f> so
      > > f> that I can see their reactions if they answer (they mostly
      don't).
      > >
      > > Comments are addressed - in the next draft, and after the WG as a
      whole
      > > has discussed them. Or we say (as we did in the recent last call
      > > draft) that particular comments are not addressed.
      > >
      > >
      > > f> Is
      > > f> it better to send them to www-svg-comments@w...?
      > >
      > > Yes.
      > >
      > > If you also want to discuss them, then copy the comments here.
      > >
      > > f> --- In svg-developers@y..., "Antoine Quint" <antoine@g...>
      wrote:
      > >
      > >>>>About SVG 1.1 supporting separate animation for instances, is
      it
      > >>>>
      > > f> true.
      > >
      > >>>>Is there something like these in SVG 1.1?
      > >>>>
      > >>>I don't think it is clear at the moment. Feel free to send a
      formal
      > >>>comment that will be taken into account by the Working Group at
      > >>>www-svg-comments@w...
      > >>>
      > >>>Antoine
      > >>>
      > >
      > >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.