Formal comments [CORRECTION] (was:Re: [svg-developers] Re: Animated instances (was: Animation and begin=mouseover in )
- Hi Dean and Chris
I am happy to see that you are not ignoring me, so I will be more
cool with the next comments of the spec and try to get some feedback
on the svg-developers list.
--- In svg-developers@y..., Dean Jackson <dean@w...> wrote:
> The comments list is svg-comments@w...
> (not www-svg-comments@w...). The messages
> are only available to W3C members.
> The public mail list is www-svg@w...
> This is a public list with archives. Only
> subscribers can post.
> You can post to either, but we prefer www-svg@w...
> so that the rest of the public can see the comments
> and discussion.
> It's possible that we will make public our response
> to all last call comments, but this is not decided yet.
> Chris Lilley wrote:
> > On Friday, March 01, 2002, 1:24:49 PM, fruc13 wrote:
> > f> I proposed them add an xlink:actuate attribute at least to the
> > f> element, this would enable an image to begin loading after an
> > f> and not always at the beginning of the main svg. This would
> > f> sequential downloading of animated images, so that the first
> > f> the animation would load faster.
> > Yes, we read that.
> > f> iztok jeras
> > f> www.rattus.info
> > f> P.S.: About formal comments, I send comments to www-svg@w...
> > That is a discussion list, not a comment drop-box. (btw its
> > f> so
> > f> that I can see their reactions if they answer (they mostly
> > Comments are addressed - in the next draft, and after the WG as a
> > has discussed them. Or we say (as we did in the recent last call
> > draft) that particular comments are not addressed.
> > f> Is
> > f> it better to send them to www-svg-comments@w...?
> > Yes.
> > If you also want to discuss them, then copy the comments here.
> > f> --- In svg-developers@y..., "Antoine Quint" <antoine@g...>
> >>>>About SVG 1.1 supporting separate animation for instances, is
> > f> true.
> >>>>Is there something like these in SVG 1.1?
> >>>I don't think it is clear at the moment. Feel free to send a
> >>>comment that will be taken into account by the Working Group at