Re: [stoics] Re: Applying ancient principles to modern circumstances
- "Steve Stoker's point seem to suggest eclectically applying Stoicism in a way that works for the individual, and not to be too rigid."Hi Richard,What you said above is about right, for me, my application of Stoa etc. I HAVE tried black/white,rigid, rigid, rigid in the past and it simply didn't work for me. Rigidity started to = obsession/complusion.Absolutely, from my own experience, I found that the "golden mean" is ideal--for me.But I absolutely cannot speak for others or have any desire whatsoever to proselytize. If othersare led to paths of total abstinance in any thing, I pat them on the back and agree with them, that'swhat they want to do.In other words, for me (always for me, never for others), there is not a right or wrong approach here.However, at the same time, I have no problem at all in thinking that laws of societies must be black/white,either/or. Then, if enough people disagree with the laws, they may change the laws either throughpolitical, legal means or through revolution. Also, in cases of jury trials, black/white may be mitigated,and what may have started out as rigid may become less so....I don't know if this sentence is clear!Best,SteveFrom: Richard <pmsrxw@...>
To: Stoics <email@example.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [stoics] Re: Applying ancient principles to modern circumstances
It is perfectly possible to believe in restraint and using one's judgement without being anti-sex. I tried to make that clear in my post and, once again, apologise if that did not come across. »
I get your latest points but now I'm befuddled
You seem to have rejected both "victorian" sexual mores and and "moderation" / "golden mean" as a valid stoic alternative. So I'm lost as to where you do stand.
Also I'm lost as to how "orthodox" vs. How flexible your Stoic views are.
Steve Stoker's point seem to suggest eclectically applying Stoicism in a way that works for the individual, and not to be too rigid.
As a novice, this makes sense to me, because I'm not close to mastering the entire system. So I'm working towards the next level all the time.
“Do you want to be right or do you want to be happy?”
~ Dr. Wayne Dyer
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
- The stoic
is a philosopher
ever faithful to reason
and to the rational order
of the Whole.
is noble and tranquil.
His concern is his and every
one's well-being though he well
knows that Good lies within.
He has no doubts
about what is and what is not
in his power so that his desires are
ever fulfilled, his aversions never incurred.
He assents only to true values.
He embraces life
with courage and temper,
is righteous and happy regardless
time, place or circumstances, for he uses
all semblances to a virtuous end.
Since he is
a free man, no one
is his master, nor is he the master
of anyone. His attitude is such that he
exemplifies a virtuous life for others.
find such a man,
please tell me, for nothing
is more dear to me than to meet
a true friend