Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

HI1-A Kreutz

Expand Messages
  • karlbattams
    I think I see Rob s reported Kreutz but there s also this much brighter one which I assume is Marek s: # HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
    Message 1 of 3 , Feb 13, 2009
      I think I see Rob's reported Kreutz but there's also this much
      brighter one which I assume is Marek's:

      # HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
      6.864 2009-02-11T20:09:01 128.6 HI1 0 936 308
      6.805 2009-02-11T20:49:01 128.8 HI1 0 939 309
      6.542 2009-02-11T22:09:01 128.5 HI1 0 949 318
      6.471 2009-02-11T22:49:01 128.5 HI1 0 952 320
      6.361 2009-02-11T23:29:01 128.4 HI1 0 956 324

      ~~Karl
    • Alan Watson
      Gidday Gents, Using Rob s recovery of his previous Stereo kreutz in C3. The time difference was 7-10 hrs before a C3 detection was made. all positions (0,0)
      Message 2 of 3 , Feb 13, 2009
        Gidday Gents,
        Using Rob's recovery of his previous Stereo kreutz in C3.
        The time difference was 7-10 hrs before a C3 detection was made.
         
        all positions (0,0) upleft  image pixvalue   x   y  slice
         
        Rainer's - kreutz - could be in C3 0210_1200 hrs and beyond
        1 H1a:20090210_032901_s4h1A 36.7287 1019 651 6
        2 H1a:20090210_024901_s4h1A 26.9258 1015 654 5
        3 H1a:20090210_020901_s4h1A 34.9285 1010 658 4
         
        Rob's detection is HI1a plus 7-10hrs is very close to 0211_1300hrs, Marek's report time
        4 H1a:20090211_032901_s4h1A 33.5559 1019 652 42
        5 H1a:20090211_020901_s4h1A 33.1210 1011 659 40
        6 H1a:20090211_012901_s4h1A 34.3948 1005 663 39
        7 H1a:20090210_232901_s4h1A 26.8701 989 672 36
         
        Karl's report is a rising new Kreutz and the timing is beyond Mareks report.
        No SOHO confirms for this report.
        8 H1a:20090211_232901_s4h1A 24.8998 959 698 72
        9 H1a:20090211_224901_s4h1A 31.5753 953 702 71
        10 H1a:20090211_212901_s4h1A 23.0651 943 709 69
        11 H1a:20090211_204901_s4h1A 21.7486 939 711 68
        12 H1a:20090211_200901_s4h1A 24.1661 935 714 67
        13 H1a:20090211_192901_s4h1A 24.2281 932 717 66
        14 H1a:20090211_184901_s4h1A 25.2190 927 720 65
         
        So, I think this last one looks like an inside job, and we was robbed ;)
        Kind regards,
            Alan Watson
         

        ----- Original Message -----
        Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:40 PM
        Subject: [stereohunter] HI1-A Kreutz

        I think I see Rob's reported Kreutz but there's also this much
        brighter one which I assume is Marek's:

        # HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
        6.864 2009-02-11T20: 09:01 128.6 HI1 0 936 308
        6.805 2009-02-11T20: 49:01 128.8 HI1 0 939 309
        6.542 2009-02-11T22: 09:01 128.5 HI1 0 949 318
        6.471 2009-02-11T22: 49:01 128.5 HI1 0 952 320
        6.361 2009-02-11T23: 29:01 128.4 HI1 0 956 324

        ~~Karl

      • rrmedic@aol.com
        Robbery!!! YAAAA hehehe Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T ... From: Alan Watson Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:03:51 To:
        Message 3 of 3 , Feb 14, 2009
          Robbery!!! YAAAA hehehe

          Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


          From: "Alan Watson"
          Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:03:51 +1100
          To: <stereohunter@yahoogroups.com>
          Subject: Re: [stereohunter] HI1-A Kreutz

          Gidday Gents,
          Using Rob's recovery of his previous Stereo kreutz in C3.
          The time difference was 7-10 hrs before a C3 detection was made.
           
          all positions (0,0) upleft  image pixvalue   x   y  slice
           
          Rainer's - kreutz - could be in C3 0210_1200 hrs and beyond
          1 H1a:20090210_ 032901_s4h1A 36.7287 1019 651 6
          2 H1a:20090210_ 024901_s4h1A 26.9258 1015 654 5
          3 H1a:20090210_ 020901_s4h1A 34.9285 1010 658 4
           
          Rob's detection is HI1a plus 7-10hrs is very close to 0211_1300hrs, Marek's report time
          4 H1a:20090211_ 032901_s4h1A 33.5559 1019 652 42
          5 H1a:20090211_ 020901_s4h1A 33.1210 1011 659 40
          6 H1a:20090211_ 012901_s4h1A 34.3948 1005 663 39
          7 H1a:20090210_ 232901_s4h1A 26.8701 989 672 36
           
          Karl's report is a rising new Kreutz and the timing is beyond Mareks report.
          No SOHO confirms for this report.
          8 H1a:20090211_ 232901_s4h1A 24.8998 959 698 72
          9 H1a:20090211_ 224901_s4h1A 31.5753 953 702 71
          10 H1a:20090211_ 212901_s4h1A 23.0651 943 709 69
          11 H1a:20090211_ 204901_s4h1A 21.7486 939 711 68
          12 H1a:20090211_ 200901_s4h1A 24.1661 935 714 67
          13 H1a:20090211_ 192901_s4h1A 24.2281 932 717 66
          14 H1a:20090211_ 184901_s4h1A 25.2190 927 720 65
           
          So, I think this last one looks like an inside job, and we was robbed ;)
          Kind regards,
              Alan Watson
           

          ----- Original Message -----
          Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:40 PM
          Subject: [stereohunter] HI1-A Kreutz

          I think I see Rob's reported Kreutz but there's also this much
          brighter one which I assume is Marek's:

          # HEIGHT DATE TIME ANGLE TEL FC COL ROW
          6.864 2009-02-11T20: 09:01 128.6 HI1 0 936 308
          6.805 2009-02-11T20: 49:01 128.8 HI1 0 939 309
          6.542 2009-02-11T22: 09:01 128.5 HI1 0 949 318
          6.471 2009-02-11T22: 49:01 128.5 HI1 0 952 320
          6.361 2009-02-11T23: 29:01 128.4 HI1 0 956 324

          ~~Karl

        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.