Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

akasha

Expand Messages
  • celestial_vision
    ... =================== Hi Starman, Wasn t sure you were still around, but I am glad that you are. Last time I thought you said you would be devoting your time
    Message 1 of 13 , Apr 5, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Durward Starman wrote:

      > Does no one on this list want to talk about spiritual science at all?
      > There are thousands of lists for political rantings and other
      > lower-astral garbage. Steiner brought anthroposophy into the world for
      > us to use it to lift ourselves up, not go lower.
      >
      > -starman

      ===================
      Hi Starman,
      Wasn't sure you were still around, but I am glad that you are. Last time
      I thought you said you would be devoting your time to other matters.

      In regards to a Steiner lecture that was read the other day, it was
      mentioned that the spiritual thoughts of humans are recorded in the Akasha.
      What do you think constitutes spiritual thought?

      [GA 152]
      "What a man acquires in the way of occult knowledge lives not only in
      his soul but is inscribed into the Akasha-substance of the world. When
      we make a thought of occult science come alive in our souls, it is at
      once inscribed into the Akasha-substance and this is of significance for
      the general evolution of the world. For no being in the whole world
      other than man is able to make in the Akasha-substance the inscriptions
      that can be called by the name of Occult Science.

      It is important to bear in mind one characteristic feature of the
      Akasha-substance, namely that in the spiritual world between death and a
      new birth, man lives in this substance, just as here on the earth he
      lives in the atmosphere."
      -----
      Also, we are warned not think of the spiritual as a very fine or wispy
      material substance. But here he is saying that the Akasha is substance.
      Any thoughts? Can anyone expand on this to help me understand?
      - Stephen
    • Durward Starman
      ******* Well, I am going to give the list one more try. I ll also start posting the Calendar of the Soul mantras again at Easter. I hope someone here uses them
      Message 2 of 13 , Apr 5, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        ******* Well, I am going to give the list one more try. I'll also start posting the Calendar of the Soul mantras again at Easter. I hope someone here uses them ---and uses the list for something.
         
           "Spiritual" thinking can be understood by studying Dr. Steiner's philosophical works or any of his basic books. (It's unfortunate that the word spiritual has come to mean a "nice" person or vaguely "moral." That's an absurd oversimplification and doesn't help with understanding what spiritual thinking could mean.)
         
           When you look at plants or any other natural things, the BODY is what tells you of their appearance (which of course is only temporary and constantly changes, to a greater or lesser extent). It does so through the senses. Through your SOUL, you make an image inside of what you perceive, and also have pleasure or displeasure in it: I like this flower's color, I don't like the smell of stinkweed. But whether you like a plant's appearance or not has nothing to do with the plant's objective nature. When you study plants scientifically, as a botanist does, then your THINKING, which is a SPIRITUAL ACTION--- TRUE thinking, not merely the "having of mental images"--- is able to grasp the ESSENCE of a thing. THINKING IN ESSENCES IS SPIRITUAL THINKING---- as opposed to the mere outer appearances of things, or your feelings of like/dislike about them. It is something that we are born able to do but which many adults do only rarely, unfortunately--- but like any unused muscle, it can be developed again. We participate in the eternal through THIS kind of thinking, hence the knowledge of eternal Truth as well as of what is morally Good comes from it.
         
           A good place to work towards understanding this is the first chapter of Theosophy, which our small study group just went through. Just read the first few pages on Spirit, Soul and Body.
         
        Starman

        www.DrStarman.com


         
        > To: steiner@yahoogroups.com
        > From: celestial_vision@...
        > Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:33:58 -0400
        > Subject: [steiner] akasha
        >
        > Durward Starman wrote:
        >
        > > Does no one on this list want to talk about spiritual science at all?
        > > There are thousands of lists for political rantings and other
        > > lower-astral garbage. Steiner brought anthroposophy into the world for
        > > us to use it to lift ourselves up, not go lower.
        > >
        > > -starman
        >
        > ===================
        > Hi Starman,
        > Wasn't sure you were still around, but I am glad that you are. Last time
        > I thought you said you would be devoting your time to other matters.
        >
        > In regards to a Steiner lecture that was read the other day, it was
        > mentioned that the spiritual thoughts of humans are recorded in the Akasha.
        > What do you think constitutes spiritual thought?
        >
        > [GA 152]
        > "What a man acquires in the way of occult knowledge lives not only in
        > his soul but is inscribed into the Akasha-substance of the world. When
        > we make a thought of occult science come alive in our souls, it is at
        > once inscribed into the Akasha-substance and this is of significance for
        > the general evolution of the world. For no being in the whole world
        > other than man is able to make in the Akasha-substance the inscriptions
        > that can be called by the name of Occult Science.
        >
        > It is important to bear in mind one characteristic feature of the
        > Akasha-substance, namely that in the spiritual world between death and a
        > new birth, man lives in this substance, just as here on the earth he
        > lives in the atmosphere."
        > -----
        > Also, we are warned not think of the spiritual as a very fine or wispy
        > material substance. But here he is saying that the Akasha is substance.
        > Any thoughts? Can anyone expand on this to help me understand?
        > - Stephen
        >
        >
        > ------------------------------------
        >
        > Post to steiner@egroups.comSearch the archives of the group at:
        > http://www.esotericlinks.com/egroupsearch.html
        >
        > Recommended books by Rudolf Steiner at:
        > http://www.esotericlinks.com/steinerbooks.html
        >
        > ommended books by Rudolf Steiner at:
        > http://www.esotericlinks.com/steinerbooks.html
        >
        > Yahoo! Groups Links
        >
        > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
        > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/steiner/
        >
        > <*> Your email settings:
        > Individual Email | Traditional
        >
        > <*> To change settings online go to:
        > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/steiner/join
        > (Yahoo! ID required)
        >
        > <*> To change settings via email:
        > mailto:steiner-digest@yahoogroups.com
        > mailto:steiner-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
        >
        > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        > steiner-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
        >
        > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
        > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
        >


        Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
      • carol
        Dunward: « Spiritual thinking can be understood by studying Dr. Steiner s philosophical works or any of his basic books. » Yes Dunward, spiritual thinking
        Message 3 of 13 , Apr 10, 2009
        • 0 Attachment
          Dunward: « "Spiritual" thinking can be understood by studying Dr.
          Steiner's philosophical works or any of his basic books. »




          Yes Dunward, spiritual thinking can be understood following this
          path– if approached in an unprejudiced manner – but would this
          exercise guarantee that the conceived 'spiritual thinking' will be far
          reaching. I believe that such 'far-reaching' ideal in spiritual
          thinking unfolds within an individual who first humby labours to
          transforms his lower soul bodies – and this will take TIME, EFFORT
          and great courage – and during as well as onward, there arrives the
          complex 'task' by which an individual student of spiritual science
          must begin to permit the Higer Realms to reveal inner meaning of outward
          life to his/her soul by way of spiritual concepts..




          And Michaelic courage is fundament to this ...




          Dunward: « ..(It's unfortunate that the word spiritual has come to
          mean a "nice" person or vaguely "moral." That's an absurd
          oversimplification and doesn't help with understanding what spiritual
          thinking could mean.) »




          Sometimes through Anthroposophic experience, a person is moved show
          interest in their fellowman and LOVE the (Christ seed) potential
          residing in living souls which enables them too, to reflect the will of
          the Higher Realms.




          A concept from out of Christ Jesus's life which impresses me in this
          regard is the instance where Christ Jesus stooped down and washed the
          feet of someone lower than He. Christ Jesus showed, by example of
          humility and gratitude to one lower than He that without the obvious
          pressing vulnerable shown by mankind, He would not have had reason to
          come...




          Dunward, if I, an Anthroposophist, on chosen occasions permit myself to
          lend an ear to what my 'nice and vaguely moral' earthly brother or
          sister wish to convey, I do so following the example of the Living
          Christ and do so in expression of humility towards Michael.

          Our earthly life is extremely complex and have confirmation of this, you
          have only to consider how many lectures Rudolf Steiner gave - and I'm
          sure that in the end, he remained somewhat dissapointed for not
          having had a chance to convey alittle more...

          carol.
        • Durward Starman
          Dunward: « Spiritual thinking can be understood by studying Dr. Steiner s philosophical works or any of his basic books. » Yes Dunward, spiritual thinking
          Message 4 of 13 , Apr 10, 2009
          • 0 Attachment
            Dunward: « "Spiritual" thinking can be understood by studying Dr.
            Steiner's philosophical works or any of his basic books. »

            Yes Dunward, spiritual thinking can be understood following this
            path– if approached in an unprejudiced manner – but would this
            exercise guarantee that the conceived 'spiritual thinking' will be far
            reaching. I believe that such 'far-reaching' ideal in spiritual
            thinking unfolds within an individual who first humby labours to
            transforms his lower soul bodies – and this will take TIME, EFFORT
            and great courage – and during as well as onward, there arrives the
            complex 'task' by which an individual student of spiritual science
            must begin to permit the Higer Realms to reveal inner meaning of outward
            life to his/her soul by way of spiritual concepts..

            And Michaelic courage is fundament to this ...

            Dunward: « ..(It's unfortunate that the word spiritual has come to
            mean a "nice" person or vaguely "moral." That's an absurd
            oversimplification and doesn't help with understanding what spiritual
            thinking could mean.) »

            Sometimes through Anthroposophic experience, a person is moved show
            interest in their fellowman and LOVE the (Christ seed) potential
            residing in living souls which enables them too, to reflect the will of
            the Higher Realms.

            A concept from out of Christ Jesus's life which impresses me in this
            regard is the instance where Christ Jesus stooped down and washed the
            feet of someone lower than He. Christ Jesus showed, by example of
            humility and gratitude to one lower than He that without the obvious
            pressing vulnerable shown by mankind, He would not have had reason to
            come...

            Dunward, if I, an Anthroposophist, on chosen occasions permit myself to
            lend an ear to what my 'nice and vaguely moral' earthly brother or
            sister wish to convey, I do so following the example of the Living
            Christ and do so in expression of humility towards Michael.

            Our earthly life is extremely complex and have confirmation of this, you
            have only to consider how many lectures Rudolf Steiner gave - and I'm
            sure that in the end, he remained somewhat dissapointed for not
            having had a chance to convey alittle more...


             
            Hello Carol,
             
               Unfortunately you seem to have misunderstood what I wrote as much as you misunderstood my name. Perhaps English is not your native language? I am reproducing the entire post below, as the parts you responded to would not be helpful for anyone trying to understand what "spiritual thinking" means in anthroposophy. It would have been much better to respond to the central part of it instead of read the 2 introductory sentences and then stop.
             
              To keep it simple, let's stick to what can be perceived by the senses, things in nature. If I look at a lily, the white color of its flowers (if it's in bloom, as many are now, at Eastertime) strikes me, and I may say "How beautiful". None of that--- the temporary appearance of the plant now, nor my feelings about it--- has anything to do with the SSSENTIAL NATURE of the plant, its being or spirit. If, however, I think the idea "lily" as a botanist does, with all the scientific understanding of this particular species of plant that comes from that thinking, THAT is operating on the spirit-level. Thinking in ESSENCES.
             
               Instead of Durward or Carol, think the thought "the human being." Granted, non-scientsts might need to practice a bit to do it. Try a few thoughts like these: quartz crystal, perennial plant, organism, substance, activity. All those are good examples of pure thinking. If you have not done any in awhile, you might need to study each one to make an empty word into an idea you can think.
             
                If you're not able to do so, let's continue the conversation about thinking, but not with emotions as they are not part of it. (Once you HAVE spiritual thoughts you will develop feelings for them, but if trying to have them at first, emotions are pointless.)
             
              And by the way, the idea "substance" does not have to mean physical substance like the elements. The akasha is etheric/astral substance. Thinking in pure essences uses astral (soul) "substance". 
             
             
              -starman

             


            Subject: RE: [steiner] akasha

            ******* 
             
               "Spiritual" thinking can be understood by studying Dr. Steiner's philosophical works or any of his basic books. (It's unfortunate that the word spiritual has come to mean a "nice" person or vaguely "moral." That's an absurd oversimplification and doesn't help with understanding what spiritual thinking could mean.)
             
               When you look at plants or any other natural things, the BODY is what tells you of their appearance (which of course is only temporary and constantly changes, to a greater or lesser extent). It does so through the senses. Through your SOUL, you make an image inside of what you perceive, and also have pleasure or displeasure in it: I like this flower's color, I don't like the smell of stinkweed. But whether you like a plant's appearance or not has nothing to do with the plant's objective nature. When you study plants scientifically, as a botanist does, then your THINKING, which is a SPIRITUAL ACTION--- TRUE thinking, not merely the "having of mental images"--- is able to grasp the ESSENCE of a thing. THINKING IN ESSENCES IS SPIRITUAL THINKING---- as opposed to the mere outer appearances of things, or your feelings of like/dislike about them. It is something that we are born able to do but which many adults do only rarely, unfortunately- -- but like any unused muscle, it can be developed again. We participate in the eternal through THIS kind of thinking, hence the knowledge of eternal Truth as well as of what is morally Good comes from it.
             
               A good place to work towards understanding this is the first chapter of Theosophy, which our small study group just went through. Just read the first few pages on Spirit, Soul and Body.
             
            Starman



            >
            > ============ =======
            > Hi Starman,
            > Wasn't sure you were still around, but I am glad that you are. Last time
            > I thought you said you would be devoting your time to other matters.
            >
            > In regards to a Steiner lecture that was read the other day, it was
            > mentioned that the spiritual thoughts of humans are recorded in the Akasha.
            > What do you think constitutes spiritual thought?
            >
            > [GA 152]
            > "What a man acquires in the way of occult knowledge lives not only in
            > his soul but is inscribed into the Akasha-substance of the world. When
            > we make a thought of occult science come alive in our souls, it is at
            > once inscribed into the Akasha-substance and this is of significance for
            > the general evolution of the world. For no being in the whole world
            > other than man is able to make in the Akasha-substance the inscriptions
            > that can be called by the name of Occult Science.
            >
            > It is important to bear in mind one characteristic feature of the
            > Akasha-substance, namely that in the spiritual world between death and a
            > new birth, man lives in this substance, just as here on the earth he
            > lives in the atmosphere."
            > -----
            > Also, we are warned not think of the spiritual as a very fine or wispy
            > material substance. But here he is saying that the Akasha is substance.
            > Any thoughts? Can anyone expand on this to help me understand?




            Recent Activity
              Visit Your Group
              Give Back
              Yahoo! for Good

              Get inspired

              by a good cause.

              Y! Toolbar
              Get it Free!

              easy 1-click access

              to your groups.

              Yahoo! Groups
              Start a group

              in 3 easy steps.

              Connect with others.

              .



              Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
            • carol
              Hello Durward, I m sorry about the letter mixup in my spelling your name – I hope this didn t throw you off too much - it surprises even me when my eyes seem
              Message 5 of 13 , Apr 10, 2009
              • 0 Attachment

                Hello Durward, I'm sorry about the letter mixup in my spelling your name – I hope this didn't throw you off too much - it surprises even me when my eyes seem to rule something of my soul and then I miss something so obvious.


                You know Durward, I really don't want to engage in a contest with you – I enjoy when you show me your Anthroposophic qualities without condescention etc - and I sincerely hope that you will allow me to explain something to you - as gentle as I  possible can-  while also hoping that you will understand that I'm not trying to indoctrinate you.


                ... Seeing as your Akasha post quickly followed the Body Politics one – in fact it was a close offshoot of this second mentioned one – I in fact still retained the 'thought images' cited in the BP post when I came upon the description of 'spiritual thinking' cited in the Akasha post.


                I'm glad you explained yourself in your last address to me but most especially I'm glad that you reinforced your 'individuality' by pointing out to me that I had mis– read and thus mis- spelled a letter in your name.


                In this latest post you so beautifully presented : « .... Thinking in ESSENCES.

                Instead of Durward or Carol, think the thought "the human being... »


                However, in a closely tied post (Body Politics), you wrote the following concerning, some human beings : « The links are to wackos hawking conspiracy theory nonsense..  »


                Now Durward, concerning this second instance mentioned above, would it be possible for you to  consider that a genuine Anthroposophist can  listen out for and then 'hear' what in essense those particular human beings, those individuals, those living souls were wishing to convey, over and above what you, as an individual, as an Anthroposophist,  know and identify as 'lower astral' ?


                I've picked up an impression of you that you are not in the habit of associating immediate earthly events with Spiritual Science - I sort of understand that consciousness soul viewing of immediate earth activities – as they relate to world history – is not terribly evident nor desirable for many Anthroposophists. Even I avoided viewing world events through an 'Anthropsophical lens' for a great many years..


                ... I did in fact post a link which described an apparently 'objective' eyewitness account of secretive instructions being given to American police officers and this is apparently  happening pretty much in 'real time' - (I have a sister and brother in law who are police officers, so I'm perhaps a little astute about things like this ).


                My point in bringing the 'link' up was not to invite Anthroposophists to 'dive down' with their own soul forces and attune these with the lower astral soul activity which obviously is the comfortable range used by the individuals in the video. No - it was to OBJECTIVELY listen to the inside information which apparently a friend and colleague of these 2 individuals had recently conveyed to them.


                In Anthroposohy we do know that elitist occult movements have a hand in the power structure of our countries and we also know that given the opportunity, they do conspire against humanity's 'right' to FREE SPIRITUAL evolution. It was having immediately to do with this fact - itself recognized by spiritual science - that I posted the info as an act of sharing . By doing so, I wasn't actually stating that such a thing will happen - for example, it is also possible that the police officers were being tricked, that they were being prepared for another more unpleasant  'unannounced' event and that the bank 'holiday' was used as an obvious and convienent 'stand in'. Who knows ? The funny thing about this is that something secretive is apparently likely to  take place on the North American continent for the reason that something secretive is already recognized to happen.


                Again, how might this connect with consciousness soul development ? It appears that in  our consciousness soul epoch, when enough people have the courage to  look at uncomfortable facts - they inevitably form a solid force against which the elist occult forces must contend.  In other words,  the more people discover  secretive plans like the ones cited here,  the more these plans are forced to 'fall'.

                Also having to do with this topic is something which Rudolf Steiner mentioned in that there  remain many members Michael's school who have not yet found Anthropsophy.

                Carol.


                 

                 

              • Durward Starman
                ******* Sorry, Carol, I have no interest in this topic, or in conspiracy theories in general. I had an interest in Steven s question of what constitutes
                Message 6 of 13 , Apr 10, 2009
                • 0 Attachment
                  ******* Sorry, Carol, I have no interest in this topic, or in conspiracy theories in general. I had an interest in Steven's question of what constitutes "spiritual thinking", and other parts of the study of anthroposophy, to which you responded.
                   
                     If you regard wanting to stay on topic as being condescending, well I'm sorry, but I was answering his question, which has little to do with what you wrote.
                   
                    You're welcome to pursue your topic with others here if they are interested. Pursuit of it, I would say, will not contribute anything to ours. Political discussion usually generates much heat but little light. It has nothing to do with pure thinking except in the most arcane heights of political science, and there it's typically quite abstracted.

                  Starman



                   

                  To: steiner@yahoogroups.com
                  From: organicethics@...
                  Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:56:31 +0000
                  Subject: [steiner] Re: akasha




                  Hello Durward, I'm sorry about the letter mixup in my spelling your name – I hope this didn't throw you off too much - it surprises even me when my eyes seem to rule something of my soul and then I miss something so obvious.


                  You know Durward, I really don't want to engage in a contest with you – I enjoy when you show me your Anthroposophic qualities without condescention etc - and I sincerely hope that you will allow me to explain something to you - as gentle as I  possible can-  while also hoping that you will understand that I'm not trying to indoctrinate you.


                  ... Seeing as your Akasha post quickly followed the Body Politics one – in fact it was a close offshoot of this second mentioned one – I in fact still retained the 'thought images' cited in the BP post when I came upon the description of 'spiritual thinking' cited in the Akasha post.


                  I'm glad you explained yourself in your last address to me but most especially I'm glad that you reinforced your 'individuality' by pointing out to me that I had mis– read and thus mis- spelled a letter in your name.


                  In this latest post you so beautifully presented : « .... Thinking in ESSENCES.

                  Instead of Durward or Carol, think the thought "the human being... »


                  However, in a closely tied post (Body Politics), you wrote the following concerning, some human beings : « The links are to wackos hawking conspiracy theory nonsense..  »


                  Now Durward, concerning this second instance mentioned above, would it be possible for you to  consider that a genuine Anthroposophist can  listen out for and then 'hear' what in essense those particular human beings, those individuals, those living souls were wishing to convey, over and above what you, as an individual, as an Anthroposophist,  know and identify as 'lower astral' ?


                  I've picked up an impression of you that you are not in the habit of associating immediate earthly events with Spiritual Science - I sort of understand that consciousness soul viewing of immediate earth activities – as they relate to world history – is not terribly evident nor desirable for many Anthroposophists. Even I avoided viewing world events through an 'Anthropsophical lens' for a great many years..


                  ... I did in fact post a link which described an apparently 'objective' eyewitness account of secretive instructions being given to American police officers and this is apparently  happening pretty much in 'real time' - (I have a sister and brother in law who are police officers, so I'm perhaps a little astute about things like this ).


                  My point in bringing the 'link' up was not to invite Anthroposophists to 'dive down' with their own soul forces and attune these with the lower astral soul activity which obviously is the comfortable range used by the individuals in the video. No - it was to OBJECTIVELY listen to the inside information which apparently a friend and colleague of these 2 individuals had recently conveyed to them.


                  In Anthroposohy we do know that elitist occult movements have a hand in the power structure of our countries and we also know that given the opportunity, they do conspire against humanity's 'right' to FREE SPIRITUAL evolution. It was having immediately to do with this fact - itself recognized by spiritual science - that I posted the info as an act of sharing . By doing so, I wasn't actually stating that such a thing will happen - for example, it is also possible that the police officers were being tricked, that they were being prepared for another more unpleasant  'unannounced' event and that the bank 'holiday' was used as an obvious and convienent 'stand in'. Who knows ? The funny thing about this is that something secretive is apparently likely to  take place on the North American continent for the reason that something secretive is already recognized to happen.


                  Again, how might this connect with consciousness soul development ? It appears that in  our consciousness soul epoch, when enough people have the courage to  look at uncomfortable facts - they inevitably form a solid force against which the elist occult forces must contend.  In other words,  the more people discover  secretive plans like the ones cited here,  the more these plans are forced to 'fall'.
                  Also having to do with this topic is something which Rudolf Steiner mentioned in that there  remain many members Michael's school who have not yet found Anthropsophy.
                  Carol.

                   
                   



                  Rediscover Hotmail®: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry Check it out.
                • carol
                  I m not interested in pursuing this topic with anyone. It s now Easter weekend, apparently also the 100th anniversary of Rudolf Steiner s initial mention of
                  Message 7 of 13 , Apr 10, 2009
                  • 0 Attachment
                    I'm not interested in pursuing this topic with anyone.

                    It's now Easter weekend, apparently also the 100th anniversary of
                    Rudolf Steiner's initial mention of the Etheric Christ and it is within
                    this that I will hold and guard my thoughts and soul forces. carol.






                    --- In steiner@yahoogroups.com, Durward Starman <DrStarman@...> wrote:
                    >
                    >
                    > ******* Sorry, Carol, I have no interest in this topic, or in
                    conspiracy theories in general. I had an interest in Steven's question
                    of what constitutes "spiritual thinking", and other parts of the study
                    of anthroposophy, to which you responded.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > If you regard wanting to stay on topic as being condescending, well
                    I'm sorry, but I was answering his question, which has little to do with
                    what you wrote.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > You're welcome to pursue your topic with others here if they are
                    interested. Pursuit of it, I would say, will not contribute anything to
                    ours. Political discussion usually generates much heat but little light.
                    It has nothing to do with pure thinking except in the most arcane
                    heights of political science, and there it's typically quite abstracted.
                    >
                    >
                    > Starman
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > To: steiner@yahoogroups.com
                    > From: organicethics@...
                    > Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:56:31 +0000
                    > Subject: [steiner] Re: akasha
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > Hello Durward, I'm sorry about the letter mixup in my spelling your
                    name – I hope this didn't throw you off too much - it surprises even
                    me when my eyes seem to rule something of my soul and then I miss
                    something so obvious.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > You know Durward, I really don't want to engage in a contest with you
                    – I enjoy when you show me your Anthroposophic qualities without
                    condescention etc - and I sincerely hope that you will allow me to
                    explain something to you - as gentle as I possible can- while also
                    hoping that you will understand that I'm not trying to indoctrinate you.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > ... Seeing as your Akasha post quickly followed the Body Politics one
                    – in fact it was a close offshoot of this second mentioned one –
                    I in fact still retained the 'thought images' cited in the BP post when
                    I came upon the description of 'spiritual thinking' cited in the Akasha
                    post.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > I'm glad you explained yourself in your last address to me but most
                    especially I'm glad that you reinforced your 'individuality' by pointing
                    out to me that I had mis– read and thus mis- spelled a letter in
                    your name.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > In this latest post you so beautifully presented : « .... Thinking
                    in ESSENCES.
                    >
                    > Instead of Durward or Carol, think the thought "the human being...
                    »
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > However, in a closely tied post (Body Politics), you wrote the
                    following concerning, some human beings : « The links are to wackos
                    hawking conspiracy theory nonsense.. »
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > Now Durward, concerning this second instance mentioned above, would it
                    be possible for you to consider that a genuine Anthroposophist can
                    listen out for and then 'hear' what in essense those particular human
                    beings, those individuals, those living souls were wishing to convey,
                    over and above what you, as an individual, as an Anthroposophist, know
                    and identify as 'lower astral' ?
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > I've picked up an impression of you that you are not in the habit of
                    associating immediate earthly events with Spiritual Science - I sort of
                    understand that consciousness soul viewing of immediate earth activities
                    – as they relate to world history – is not terribly evident nor
                    desirable for many Anthroposophists. Even I avoided viewing world events
                    through an 'Anthropsophical lens' for a great many years..
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > ... I did in fact post a link which described an apparently
                    'objective' eyewitness account of secretive instructions being given to
                    American police officers and this is apparently happening pretty much in
                    'real time' - (I have a sister and brother in law who are police
                    officers, so I'm perhaps a little astute about things like this ).
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > My point in bringing the 'link' up was not to invite Anthroposophists
                    to 'dive down' with their own soul forces and attune these with the
                    lower astral soul activity which obviously is the comfortable range used
                    by the individuals in the video. No - it was to OBJECTIVELY listen to
                    the inside information which apparently a friend and colleague of these
                    2 individuals had recently conveyed to them.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > In Anthroposohy we do know that elitist occult movements have a hand
                    in the power structure of our countries and we also know that given the
                    opportunity, they do conspire against humanity's 'right' to FREE
                    SPIRITUAL evolution. It was having immediately to do with this fact -
                    itself recognized by spiritual science - that I posted the info as an
                    act of sharing . By doing so, I wasn't actually stating that such a
                    thing will happen - for example, it is also possible that the police
                    officers were being tricked, that they were being prepared for another
                    more unpleasant 'unannounced' event and that the bank 'holiday' was used
                    as an obvious and convienent 'stand in'. Who knows ? The funny thing
                    about this is that something secretive is apparently likely to take
                    place on the North American continent for the reason that something
                    secretive is already recognized to happen.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > Again, how might this connect with consciousness soul development ? It
                    appears that in our consciousness soul epoch, when enough people have
                    the courage to look at uncomfortable facts - they inevitably form a
                    solid force against which the elist occult forces must contend. In other
                    words, the more people discover secretive plans like the ones cited
                    here, the more these plans are forced to 'fall'.
                    >
                    > Also having to do with this topic is something which Rudolf Steiner
                    mentioned in that there remain many members Michael's school who have
                    not yet found Anthropsophy.
                    >
                    > Carol.
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    >
                    > _________________________________________________________________
                    > Rediscover Hotmail®: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry
                    >
                    http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover\
                    _Mobile1_042009
                    >
                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.