Re: I AM IRON MAN
- What about quantum computing, where bits are not either in two
states, but are rather in a superposition of an infinite number of
states? If we were to replace a biological brain with a bio-
mechanical one that is _functionally_equivalent_, what would the
difference _really_ be? (and for whom?, and in with what cosmic
If we are imagining a human I-being in a process of incarnation, is
the problem with 'mechanical' things rather their inability to modify
and adapt according to the etheric formative forces, and not whether
aspects are binary or not? Certainly many aspects of the functioning
human body can already be described as having only two possible
states (such as microtubule protein conformation along nerve cells).
Does this make these aspects mechanical? Or, as you seem to point
out, is 'mechanical' something more to do with how the operation
relates to the willing I-being for whom the particular bodily element
is created in the first place - and whether or not its functionality
can support the development of the being in question in a lawful way?
It seems like it will be increasingly important for anthroposophists
to address questions like these as our technology develops, so that
we ourselves can act with freedom in love regarding situations that
may seem to bring up fear or even hatred.
What do others think?
Thanks for the post, Matthew.
--- In email@example.com, "Mathew Morrell" <tma4cbt@...> wrote:
> If my vision of the future is correct we will see the advent of a
> computerized human being whose thinking capacity is controlled and
> regulated by advanced microchip technologies capable of working
> within biological systems, specifically the brain.
> Already, computer science and medicine have combined their forces
> research digital solutions for brain diseases.
> Research scientists at USC are engineering a microchip designed to
> duplicate the biological operations performed by the hippocampus.
> the microchip succeeds, it could help people suffering from brain
> damage, particularly stroke patients, epileptics and those
> from Alzheimer's disease.
> The power of this technology would transform society, but also lead
> to crypto-technologies that go outside curative applications.
> We would see the application of biological computer chip
> aimed at transforming the way in which the brain processes
> The brain, as it is, interprets data `holistically' (as my last
> proved). It has the remarkable ability to allow thought to
> data from the perspective of consciousness. It `sees', not by
> compiling minute bits of data, as a computer does, but through a
> process of integration.
> The computerized human being, on the other hand, thinks in a binary
> language form. This is a base-2 number system using two symbols,
> and 1s. Boolean algebra and the base-2 number system are
> within electronic circuitry to create all the operations on your
> computer. It is remarkably simple and powerful. In the base-2
> number system all electric impulses are reduced down to a simple
> or-no answer, 1 or 0.
> Likewise, if it were possible to think as a computer, all of
> would be reduced to mechanically-elicited yes-or-no responses.
> Instead of consciousness reaching out and participating in the act
> comprehending reality, consciousness is subverted onto the
> plane beneath where the digitalized brain gathers data flooding
> the microchip through the senses. The Ahrimanic Man would feel the
> flow of information passing through him like we might feel the wind
> blowing upon our faces, with no ability to alter or change the flow
> of thought, only react and respond. The result is a purely
> mechanical form of human life in which free will is nearly
> Mathew Morrell