Blair on Sorath and The Evil Ideology
Prime Minister Blair's SpeechRudolf Steiner September 1924 / Switzerland
Published: July 16, 2005
The following is the text of the speech delivered by Prime Minister Tony Blair on Saturday, July 16, 2005.
The greatest danger is that we fail to face up to the nature of the threat we are dealing with. What we witnessed in London last Thursday week was not an aberrant act. It was not random. It was not a product of particular local circumstances in West Yorkshire. Senseless though any such horrible murder is, it was not without sense for its organisers. It had a purpose. It was done according to a plan. It was meant.
What we are confronting here is an evil ideology. It is not a clash of civilisations: all civilised people, Muslim or other, feel revulsion at it. But it is a global struggle and it is a battle of ideas, hearts and minds, both within Islam and outside it. This is the battle that must be won, a battle not just about the terrorist methods but their views. Not just their barbaric acts, but their barbaric ideas. Not only what they do but what they think and the thinking they would impose on others.
This ideology and the violence that is inherent in it did not start a few years ago in response to a particular policy. Over the past 12 years, Al Qaeda and its associates have attacked 26 countries, killed thousands of people, many of them Muslims. They have networks in virtually every major country and thousands of fellow travellers. They are well-financed. Look at their web-sites. They aren’t unsophisticated in their propaganda. They recruit however and whoever they can and with success.
Neither is it true that they have no demands. They do. It is just that no sane person would negotiate on them. They demand the elimination of Israel; the withdrawal of all westerners from Muslim countries, irrespective of the wishes of people and Government; the establishment of effectively Taleban states and Sharia law in the Arab world en route to one Caliphate of all Muslim nations.
We don’t have to wonder what type of country those states would be. Afghanistan was such a state. Girls put out of school. Women denied even rudimentary rights. People living in abject poverty and oppression. All of it justified by reference to religious faith.
The 20th century showed how powerful political ideologies could be. This is a religious ideology, a strain within the world-wide religion of Islam, as far removed from its essential decency and truth as Protestant gunmen who kill Catholics or vice versa, are from Christianity. But do not let us underestimate it or dismiss it. Those who kill in its name believe genuinely that in doing it, they do God’s work; they go to paradise.
From the mid 1990s onwards, statements from Al Qaeda, gave very clear expression to this ideology: Every Muslim, the minute he can start differentiating, carries hatred towards the Americans, Jews and Christians. This is part of our ideology. The creation of Israel is a crime and it has to be erased. You should know that targeting Americans and Jews and killing them anywhere you find them on the earth is one of the greatest duties and one of the best acts of piety you can offer to God Almighty.
Just as great is their hatred for so-called apostate Governments in Muslim countries. This is why mainstream Muslims are also regarded as legitimate targets.
At last year’s Party Conference I talked about this ideology in these terms:
Its roots are not superficial but deep, in the madrassehs of Pakistan, in the extreme forms of Wahabi doctrine in Saudi Arabia, in the former training camps of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan; in the cauldron of Chechnya; in parts of the politics of most countries of the Middle East and many in Asia; in the extremist minority that now in every European city preach hatred of the West and our way of life. This is what we are up against. It cannot be beaten except by confronting it, symptoms and causes, head-on. Without compromise and without delusion.
The extremist propaganda is cleverly aimed at their target audience. It plays on our tolerance and good nature; it exploits the tendency to guilt of the developed world; as if it is our behaviour that should change; that if we only tried to work out and act on their grievances, we could lift this evil; that if we changed our behaviour, they would change theirs. This is a misunderstanding of a catastrophic order.
Their cause is not founded on an injustice. It is founded on a belief, one whose fanaticism is such it can’t be moderated. It can’t be remedied. It has to be stood up to. And, of course, they will use any issue that is a matter of dissent within our democracy. But we should lay bare the almost-devilish logic behind such manipulation.
If it is the plight of the Palestinians that drives them, why, every time it looks as if Israel and Palestine are making progress, does the same ideology perpetrate an outrage that turns hope back into despair?
If it is Afghanistan that motivates them, why blow up innocent Afghans on their way to their first ever election?
If it is Iraq that motivates them, why is the same ideology killing Iraqis by terror in defiance of an elected Iraqi Government?
What was September 11 2001 the reprisal for?
Why even after the first Madrid bomb and the election of a new Spanish Government, were they planning another atrocity when caught?
Why if it is the cause of Muslims that concerns them, do they kill so many with such callous indifference?
We must pull this up by its roots. Within Britain, we must join up with our Muslims community to take on the extremists. Worldwide we should confront it everywhere it exists.
Next week I and other party leaders will meet key members of the Muslim community. Out of it I hope we can get agreed action to take this common fight forward. I want also to work with other nations to promote the true face of Islam world-wide. Round the world, there are conferences already being held, numerous inter-faith dialogues in place but we need to bring all of these activities together and give them focus.
We must be clear about how we win this struggle. We should take what security measures we can. But let us not kid ourselves. In the end, it is by the power of argument, debate, true religious faith and true legitimate politics that we will defeat this threat. That means not just arguing against their terrorism but their politics and their perversion of religious faith. It means exposing as the rubbish it is, the propaganda about America and its allies wanting to punish Muslims or eradicate Islam. It means championing our values of freedom, tolerance and respect for others. It means explaining why the suppression of women and the disdain for democracy are wrong. The idea that elected Governments are the preserve of those of any other faith or culture is insulting and wrong. Muslims believe in democracy just as much as any other faith and given the chance, show it.
We must step up the urgency of our efforts. Here and abroad the times the terrorists have succeeded are all too well known. Less known are the times they have been foiled. The human life destroyed we can see. The billions of dollars every nation now spends is huge and growing. And they kill without limit. They murdered over 50 innocent people last week. But it could have been over 500. And had it been, they would have rejoiced.
The spirit of our age is one in which the prejudices of the past are put behind us, where our diversity is our strength. It is this which is under attack. Moderates are not moderate through weakness but through strength. Now is the time to show it in defence of our common values.
Steiner on Sorath and 1998:
From one basic way of considering this matter, there are two realms: the realm of NATURE which is the realm of the Father (the source of the created world both spiritually and physically)
and the realm of the SPIRIT.
The Mohammedan teachings do not know the structure of the world I have just been speaking about. They know--- and can ONLY know---the Father.
They know only the rigid doctrine: "There is one God, Allah, and none beside him, and Mohammed is his Prophet."
From this angle, the teachings of Mohammed are the strongest polarity to Christianity.
Indeed, resident in a hidden manner within the Islamic worldview is the will to do away with all freedom forever, the will to bring about a purely deterministic spiritual and social order
that would dominate every aspect of human life, for nothing else is possible if you imagine the world solely in the sense of a Father God alone.
A foreboding of this gave the apocalypse-writer (John) the feeling: The human being cannot be found, or find himself, in this. The human being cannot become filled through and through with Christ if he remains connected with the doctrine of the Father (alone). Restricted to this, the human being cannot take hold of his own humanness. He fails to become fully human if he is only able to conceive the Father God. In the end, the human being only becomes human by making
Christ alive within himself and thereby gaining protection from the material conviction that spiritual realities are illusionary and vaporous epi-phenomena of purely material causes. Entertainment of the doctrine of the Father (alone) inescapably arrives at a conceptual materialism such as represented, for example, by Darwinism, the view that the human being arises from purely material causes.
And if we regard Christianity primarily as that which accords with the Sun forces spiritually speaking, and such as is reflected / mirrored / mediated / manifested by the nine ranks of angelic
Hierarchies, then we may identify that which OPPOSES these spiritual/sun forces as "anti-sun" forces or as "sun demon." This "sun demon" works COUNTER to the Christian principle in
such a way that if a human being were to succumb to the lures of the sun demon and his inspiration, then that same human being would --- by his own free choice --- surrender all inward
connection to the divinity of Christ for an inward connection with the sub-human spiritual realms.
The apocalyptist saw this. He felt and saw the mighty (future) counter-principle of Arabism bursting in on Christianity. It was clear to him that, from this Arabism, everything arises that
brings the human being close to the purely animal nature, first of all in his views, but gradually also in his combined impulses of will and action.
And what the apocalyptist saw BEHIND the future scenes of the looming Mohammdan historical impulse was the sun demon at work, working against the sun forces, against the spiritual
If asked, the apocalyptist would have called the representatives of Arabism in Europe "human beings who have willingly dedicated themselves to the sun demon in their souls' nature."
Dear friends, the number 666 represented both the NAME and the TIME when Arabism would flow into Christianity in order to impress the seal of materialism upon western culture.
The apocalyptist portrays everything that works as a counter-principle to Christianity --- such as Arabism and its deterministic conceptual constructs --- as direct outflow from the counter-spirituality represented by the sun-demon Surat. And, in the final analysis, everything flowing from Arabism was directed ultimately against a spiritual Christian understanding of
transubstantiation. External facts certainly do not look as if this were the case but by allotting validity only to the Father principle, to the natural world-order, the sun demon forces indeed
intended to sweep away from human view an immediate feeling for that which is active in the very deepest way in a sacrament such as transubstantiation.
(The great revolutions that came about in Europe as a result of the Crusades belong under the sign of the SECOND occurrence of the number 666)
During the first 666, dear friends, Surat was still hidden but actively at work within the external process of outward events; he was not seen in clear outward manifestation.
Now before us [in 1924] lies the time of the third number 666: 1998 A.D.
At the end of this (the twentieth) century, the time will come when Surat will ONCE AGAIN raise his head most strongly out of the waves of history. Only two-thirds of the 20th century will have still to run before Surat/Sorat once again raises his head most mightily. Before this (twentieth) century is out, he will show himself through his appearance in many human beings as the one by whom many are "possessed." Human beings will appear of whom it will be impossible to believe that they are really human beings. These Surat-inspired human beings will be recognizable by their external appearance; in a terrible way they will not only scoff at everything, but will also oppose, and want to destroy, and to push into the abyss anything that is spiritual. Outwardly, they will have intense and strong dispositions, with savage countenances, and with furious destructiveness in their emotions. The intention to sweep-away anything spiritual will be deep-seated in large numbers of earthly souls, just as the apocalyptist has foreseen in the beast-like countenance, and the beast-like strength, that will underlie the deeds of the adversary over against the spiritual. Even today, hidden rage against spiritual things is already immense, yet it is still in its very early infancy in contrast to what is to come.
- - - - - - - - - -
>Source: The Book of Revelation and the Work of the Priest (GA 346)
>Rudolf Steiner 18 Lectures plus conversations
>Dornach, September 1924