- Jun 3, 2005I do wonder who those 'nuts' might be, LOL.
I for one do focus on things Steiner wrote, which obviously don't line
up with your ideas about him, but there you go.
But I don't think anyone's disputing that his letters to Reuss etc
aren't BY him. If you are, I'd surely like to know.
Expand the light, as they say . . . enquiring minds want to know.
> I just bought a newer book of Steiner lectures that might interest theSteiner. ;) .)
> conspiracy nuts who post messages in this group about Steiner's links
> "Secret Brotherhoods and the Mystery of the Human Double."
> How's that?
> (Let's not tell these guys that they won't find what they think
> they're looking for in this book, but in the process they might
> actually read something BY Steiner instead of things ABOUT
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>