2308Re: The List-
- Dec 4, 2003"which would follow only its own (purely economic) laws" I'm curious
about this, Dr. - surely we cannot expect the economic institutions
to draft and accept laws themselves that regulate their own
behavior? With the obvious disrespect for any laws already shown by
Enron, et al? I haven't read the ThreeFold Order materials,
obviously - just wondering if you could shed a little light on how
economic arenas can be kept seperate and regulated. Isn't
interconnection between all aspects of society still vital?
--- In email@example.com, DRStarman2001@a... wrote:
> plong_plong@h... writes:>
> > hello everybody,
> > Just want everyone to know that I am no spammer. I have been
> > discussions all along.
> > My interest is on science and technology. I took a one-year
> > course at Schumacher College ,UK. I also spent some time working
> > Biodynamic Garden for four months and visiting Camphill
communities. I am
> > currently enrolled in a Waldorf teacher training course in London.
> > I have read most of Steiner's lectures on the sciences and his
ideas on the
> > three-fold social order. I find his lecture on World Economy very
> > interesting. There are a number of people who are promoting his
> > ideas both in the grassroots level and on the academic arena like
> > Perlas in South East Asia and Christopher Budd in the UK.
> > All the best,
> > plong
> ********Glad to hear you're a real person, "plong", and not just a
> name to be used to spam the list. Seemed like the type of name
> I have to say that much of what I hear from people like Perlas
> relation to Steiner's "Threefold Social Order" ideas, in my
> rather is people using his name to spread their own, quite
> For instance, Steiner advocated an economic sphere quite distinct
> from the political state, which would follow only its own (purely
> laws --- and so also with the "cultural" sphere (so, for instance,
> Schools are private schools, not run by governments). But it
appears to me that
> many of the people saying they follow Steiner want MORE control of
> by the government, not less. ;-> [Not to mention the anti-Western
> Civilization bias and blindness to the current war of Wahabbi Islam
> which Steiner predicted as the result of the rise of the Sun Demon
Sorath 666 in
> 1998, as we've discussed here.]
> I find, in my experience for many years now, that often they
> socialists or communists with a thin "coating of Steiner" on top,
and once you
> draw them out in discussion, out come the Marxist slogans that show
> really think--- which is that the government should take over the
> everybody's good". That is definitely NOT the teaching of Rudolf
> > >>>
> > >>>Starman,
> > >>>I know that this list is public but a possible solution to
spammers is to
> > >>>ask new comers to list some of the books they have read on
> > >Anthroposophy and to ask them to write you a short essay on
> > particular interest in Anthroposophy.
> > >>>In other words there needs to develop a means to weed out
> > >spammers before
> > >>>they join the group.
> > >>>rick distasi
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>*******Well, I'm going to do something like that---namely, note
> > >and inquire of new members joining. In the past few weeks, for
> > we've
> > >had new members:
> > >>
> > >> Renee Lattimore (in late October)---- and then in November:
> > >> Brent Wilson of Kansas City
> > >> "Dragonfliesare dancing"
> > >> G. Renquist
> > >> "biblia1703" from the U.K.
> > >>"Dianatomi16"
> > >> "Vindexeuropa" and
> > >>"plongplong0525". (The last one I suspect is another spammer.)
> > >>
> > >>Why don't you all introduce yourselves and say what you're
> > >interested in seeing on this group?
> > >>
> > >> And by the way, another reminder: Christmas is approaching
> > >(Advent starts Nov. 30th), and we traditionally take a book to
> > together for
> > >the 12 Holy Nights here. What might people be interested in
> > >together?
> > >>-Starman
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>