Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....

Expand Messages
  • sql er
    Which layer by layer method are you using? Do you use any other techniques on top of it? Like finger tricks or something else? How good is your cube?
    Message 1 of 9 , Mar 1, 2009
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Which layer by layer method are you using?

      Do you use any other techniques on top of it? Like finger tricks or something else?

      How good is your cube?


      --- On Sat, 2/28/09, Nakai Velasquez <nakai_velasquez@...> wrote:

      > From: Nakai Velasquez <nakai_velasquez@...>
      > Subject: Re: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....
      > To: speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Saturday, February 28, 2009, 12:16 PM
      > I've stuck with the layer by layer method for 10 months
      > (I started 10 months ago) now and I avg arouned 32 seconds
      > and my best is 18.40 seconds.(LBL)
      >  
      > keep at it
      >
      > --- On Fri, 2/27/09, zacksimon81
      > <zacksimon81@...> wrote:
      >
      > From: zacksimon81 <zacksimon81@...>
      > Subject: Re: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....
      > To: speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com
      > Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com,
      > "wa77l3s_th3_ gr3at"
      > <wa77l3s_th3_ gr3at@... > wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Well ive gotten sub 30 times with begginners method
      > and im constant
      > > sub 40...all you really gotta do is know tha middle
      > layer algs by
      > > heart and be able to look ahead...also if u use tha
      > inverse alg for
      > > the last corners as well itll save you a lot of
      > time...jus practice
      > > hard and u can git it down =)
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com, sql
      > er <sql_er@>
      > wrote:
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > What is your current speed?
      > > >
      > > > I also only do layer by layer (still did not
      > learn Fridrich) and
      > was
      > > able to achieve 50-55 seconds if I just keep
      > practicing ... and I
      > > think that it is possible to get faster just with the
      > simple method
      > if
      > > you can practice a lot.
      > > >
      > > > Just make sure that your cube is not too
      > difficult to turn, and
      > that
      > > you are trying to look ahead ... sometimes you'd
      > need to slow down
      > to
      > > look ahead, but with time it will pay off.
      > > >
      > > > How low are you trying to go exactly?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > --- On Wed, 2/25/09, gammon.tyler
      > <no_reply@yahoogroup s.com>
      > wrote:
      > > >
      > > > > From: gammon.tyler <no_reply@yahoogroup
      > s.com>
      > > > > Subject: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....
      > > > > To: speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com
      > > > > Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 9:41 PM
      > > > > Thank you to those who answered already!!!!!
      > Anyone
      > > > > else???????
      > > >
      > >
      > i am having the same problem when solvng the cube begginer
      > method my fastist time is 1.29.9 but i want to show off to
      > my other
      > friends who can solve it in 1.30 to 1.50 so any advise or
      > any other
      > methods that dont require large amounts of algirythyms
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Nakai Velasquez
      I do use finger tricks, and my cube is ok ish (store bought) (no vassoline)   The layer by layer method I use has 7 steps.   ... From: sql er
      Message 2 of 9 , Mar 2, 2009
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        I do use finger tricks, and my cube is ok'ish (store bought) (no vassoline)
         
        The layer by layer method I use has 7 steps.
         


        --- On Sun, 3/1/09, sql er <sql_er@...> wrote:

        From: sql er <sql_er@...>
        Subject: Re: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....
        To: speedsolvingrubikscube@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 11:01 AM







        Which layer by layer method are you using?

        Do you use any other techniques on top of it? Like finger tricks or something else?

        How good is your cube?

        --- On Sat, 2/28/09, Nakai Velasquez <nakai_velasquez@ yahoo.com> wrote:

        > From: Nakai Velasquez <nakai_velasquez@ yahoo.com>
        > Subject: Re: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....
        > To: speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com
        > Date: Saturday, February 28, 2009, 12:16 PM
        > I've stuck with the layer by layer method for 10 months
        > (I started 10 months ago) now and I avg arouned 32 seconds
        > and my best is 18.40 seconds.(LBL)
        >  
        > keep at it
        >
        > --- On Fri, 2/27/09, zacksimon81
        > <zacksimon81@ yahoo.com> wrote:
        >
        > From: zacksimon81 <zacksimon81@ yahoo.com>
        > Subject: Re: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....
        > To: speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com
        > Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > --- In speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com,
        > "wa77l3s_th3_ gr3at"
        > <wa77l3s_th3_ gr3at@... > wrote:
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > Well ive gotten sub 30 times with begginners method
        > and im constant
        > > sub 40...all you really gotta do is know tha middle
        > layer algs by
        > > heart and be able to look ahead...also if u use tha
        > inverse alg for
        > > the last corners as well itll save you a lot of
        > time...jus practice
        > > hard and u can git it down =)
        > >
        > >
        > > --- In speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com, sql
        > er <sql_er@>
        > wrote:
        > > >
        > > >
        > > > What is your current speed?
        > > >
        > > > I also only do layer by layer (still did not
        > learn Fridrich) and
        > was
        > > able to achieve 50-55 seconds if I just keep
        > practicing ... and I
        > > think that it is possible to get faster just with the
        > simple method
        > if
        > > you can practice a lot.
        > > >
        > > > Just make sure that your cube is not too
        > difficult to turn, and
        > that
        > > you are trying to look ahead ... sometimes you'd
        > need to slow down
        > to
        > > look ahead, but with time it will pay off.
        > > >
        > > > How low are you trying to go exactly?
        > > >
        > > >
        > > > --- On Wed, 2/25/09, gammon.tyler
        > <no_reply@yahoogrou p s.com>
        > wrote:
        > > >
        > > > > From: gammon.tyler <no_reply@yahoogrou p
        > s.com>
        > > > > Subject: [Speed cubing group] THANKS BUT....
        > > > > To: speedsolvingrubiksc ube@yahoogroups. com
        > > > > Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 9:41 PM
        > > > > Thank you to those who answered already!!!!!
        > Anyone
        > > > > else???????
        > > >
        > >
        > i am having the same problem when solvng the cube begginer
        > method my fastist time is 1.29.9 but i want to show off to
        > my other
        > friends who can solve it in 1.30 to 1.50 so any advise or
        > any other
        > methods that dont require large amounts of algirythyms
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



















        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.