9862[Speed cubing group] Re: "Officialness"
- Feb 29, 1944I guess I do see some of their concern in having too many events and thus diffusing the
"hype" about the Rubik's cube... I am beginning to believe that the idea of the record for
"fastest solve" is flawed. As you all have mentioned, if the record is broken with a lucky
solve and set at something ridiculous such as 8 seconds, the record becomes
meaningless. Perhaps the RCC would consider changing their idea of the record to the
The Rubik's Cube record is unlike other sporting events. There isn't really a lucky "100
meter dash". How fast you can run that race is determined by your physical body as well
as your mental concentration.
I understand that pressure is a large factor in an international competition... but is it really
fair to consider pressure as to determine a record? It could also be argued that pressure
provides an advantageous andrenaline rush or something... I don't know.
Well, the April 3rd competition will most certainly go on. The July 10 summer
championships is still on... even if we aren't allowed to break world records, there's no
reason why speedcubing.com can't have a record category for unofficial official
tournament records and such. Hopefully we can get some more concrete answers for the
July 10 tournament.
Does anyone know if the French competition is official?
--- In email@example.com, "Terje Kristensen"
> I'm wondering about the "lot of negative feedback" that Dave have received
> about this. There cant be too many ppl outside of this group that is too
> concerned about this, and i havent read that many in here have a problem
> with this.
> As you say, eventually someone will get a lucky solve in an official
> tournament too and the official fastest solve will go below 10 sec. It's
> just a question of time.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tmao@i... [mailto:tmao@i...]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 9:54 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [Speed cubing group] Re: "Officialness"
> That's my biggest concern... the whole idea that a record of the "fastest"
> solve is
> meaningless. Lucky cases WILL happen. It doesn't matter how many times you
> the cube.
> What do you guys think about the official "fastest" record being the average
> middle 10 of
> 12 solves that we've all been doing? At my tournament, those that make it
> into the final
> round will have completed 12 solves.
> Gah... I am SO stressed right now.
> --- In email@example.com, turnthatcube <no_reply@y...>
> > I think both have a case
> > On the one site, you have to define what is an official record, and
> > on the other site a more local event might have less presure or
> > competion.
> > But when you win a big tournament, sure this will be more important
> > as a record time. To win a more local event is nice but you might
> > have not enough competition to feel a big winner. I gues the price on
> > a local event is to set a record time.
> > My experience is that it makes no difference, pressure ,stress, if it
> > is a big tournament or a more local event. Only during training with
> > friends I can now perform as expected.
> > One things remains a fact a Chris stated, someone will get a lucky
> > time, this it is bound to happen. I would consider only an official
> > average record the official fastes cuber in the world. Not the one
> > with the fastes solve
> > Some predictions
> > 3x3x3 record 13.5 this year
> > 3x3x3 average 16.5 seconds this year
> > 3x3x3 record 11.0 seconds within the upcomming 2 years
> > 3x3x3 average 15.5 seconds withing the upcomming 2 years
> > Ton
> > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, cmhardw
> > <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> > > Just my personal opinions on this issue. I think that as long as a
> > > tournament is setup to meet official rules, then it shouldn't
> > matter
> > > whether or not it is a national event or not. If a record is set,
> > > it should count as the official record. What if someone broke a
> > > Guinness record in front a judge and according to all the rules,
> > but
> > > they turned it down because not enough people were watching the
> > > person perform? What if someone came along who was really the next
> > > Tiger Woods of cubing and absolutely shattered the fastest average
> > > record and we had to say, "sorry your amazing record does not count
> > > because this tournament is not a national tournament." I think it
> > > is wrong to not allow any record set to be official.
> > >
> > > Seriously, we all know that if there are enough tournaments held,
> > > then by the law of probability someone will have almost all edges
> > > solved after finishing the corners, or someone will skip the PLL or
> > > OLL step and get a time faster than what we all normally achieve.
> > > The record WILL one day be less than 10 seconds if we have enough
> > > tournaments. Someone will get a lucky time, it is bound to happen
> > > if enough official attempts are taken.
> > >
> > > Sorry, but I have some very strong opinions on this issue. A
> > record
> > > set at a tournament with impartial judges and that follows all the
> > > other rules that we have defined as official should be the new
> > > record. As an "Official World Record holder" myself I would rather
> > > see someone shatter my one-handed 3x3x3 record in a local
> > tournament
> > > and have their attempt be the new official record than to see
> > > someone who is better than me record an official time much better
> > > than mine, but my record still count. That doesn't make any sense
> > > to me.
> > >
> > > As a record holder I totally disagree. Any record set should
> > count,
> > > regardless of whether or not the tournament has official enough
> > > status. If the tournament meets the official RCC rules, then all
> > > records set there should count, period.
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > --- In email@example.com, tmao@i... wrote:
> > > > I've been hit... I'm not exactly sure what's going to happen
> > right
> > > now but there will be
> > > > impacts on the summer tournament and any tournament that Chris
> > > decides to hold. Read
> > > > below... we're working it out right now.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Tyson
> > > > I have had quite a lot of negative feedback from people who don't
> > > think that
> > > > a local event should be allowed to break the records - the
> > > pressure of a
> > > > local event being much less than a world or national event.
> > > > Not sure what to suggest but think that the record if it gets
> > > broken can
> > > > still be submitted as a new record to rubiks.com, speedcubing.com
> > > and
> > > > Guinness but the "official" fastest time and "official" record
> > > remain until
> > > > beaten at National or International level ?
> > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > Dave
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>