Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Southern Heritage News & Views

Expand Messages
  • ~mary~
    Charles Demastus wrote: SOUTHERN HERITAGE NEWS & VIEWS is dedicated to the preservation of Southern Heritage and to defend the honour of our Confederate
    Message 1 of 331 , May 27, 2005

      Charles Demastus wrote:
      SOUTHERN HERITAGE NEWS & VIEWS is dedicated 
      to the preservation of Southern Heritage and 
      to defend the honour of our Confederate ancestors. 
      It is FREE and sent to you via E-mail.
      To subscribe send blank e-mail to:
      Southern Heritage News & Views
      Keeping You Informed
      Post your Southern events, fundraisers, 
      meetings, etc. FREE
      You can help SHNV by buying chances to 
      win this 1851 Navy Colt Replica.
      Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor:
      Get a Free Sirius Satellite Package, don't pass on this!
      CALL TO ACTION: Confederate Parks Under Assault in Memphis!  We are mobilizing.
      THE POLITICAL CESSPOOL: Mon-Fri, 7pm-9pm Central Time - AM 1380 WLRM Memphis
      "The South's Foremost Populist Radio Program!"
      Do you live outside of the Memphis reception area and want to listen to our program?
      Click Here to listen to the Political Cesspool live over the Internet!
      Dear Friends:
      Once again, we find our culture and heritage under assault by ignorant and bigoted public officials who racially grandstand in order to polarize the people.  Earlier this week, The Political Cesspool received word that there will be a public forum held in Memphis, Tennessee on Thursday, June 9, to discuss a proposal that would rename three city parks in the downtown area.  Those parks are, of course: Confederate Park, Jefferson Davis Park and Nathan Bedford Forrest Park, which also houses the noble General's grave.
      This abominable meeting was called by Shelby County Commissioner Walter Bailey and one of our sources on the County Commission confirms that the threat is real and that we should rally our troops and attend this meeting.  Interested parties will be allowed three minutes to speak either for, or against, the proposal.  Our radio show is using its power to take the lead on this issue and mobilize a counter offensive.
      I have already personally spoken with leaders of the Council of Conservative Citizens, Sons of the Confederate Veterans and League of the South.  We will be coordinating an effort to meet the enemies of true history on the front lines.  We already have quite a few people signed up to attend, but we must show up in force.  I will be damned to hell before I allow a vile degenerate like Commissioner Bailey to denigrate the name of my ancestors (one of whom died at Shiloh) for the sake of his own self hate. 
      WHEN: Thursday, June 9 @ 4:30 PM (Arrive at least one hour prior to register)
      WHAT: Public forum discussing the renaming of three Confederate Parks
      WHERE: The Pyramid Arena, Crown Room, Downtown Memphis, TN
      We must be eternally vigilant in the defense of our people.  If I have to attend farces like this once a month for the rest of my life to ensure that the legacy of the brave Confederate patriots is not defiled, then that is what I'll do.  We must not shake our heads at this and laugh it off.  Those who paid the ultimate price in the War Between the States to defend our land deserve at least one afternoon of our time in return.  Make your plans NOW to attend this event.  For more information, you may e-mail me at the address below or call me at 901-461-8904 if you'd like to be added to our list of attendees.  Please, take this seriously and help us out.
      Most Sincerely,
      James Edwards
      Host, The Political Cesspool Radio Program

      We originally covered this story on our Wednesday night program (5/25).  You can visit our streaming audio link below and click on the archived show for that date.  Scroll exactly 39 minutes, 40 seconds into that broadcast to listen to our breaking coverage of this issue.
      Click Here to listen to the Political Cesspool live over the Internet!
      THE POLITICAL CESSPOOL: Mon - Fri, 7pm-9pm Central - AM 1380 WLRM Memphis
      "The South's Foremost Populist Radio Program!"
      James Edwards: james@...
      Austin Farley: austin@...
      * * * On Air Call-In Number: 901-872-8862 * * *
      Listen LIVE via the Internet at the Official Website: www.thepoliticalcesspool.org   
      Hosts James Edwards and Austin Farley fight to preserve American heritage!
      Please Help Support Our Show
      If you feel led to aid our important work, you can make donations, made payable to Political Cesspool and mail it to the address below.  If you believe in what we're doing, please stand with us.
      The Political Cesspool
      6600 Stage Road, Suite 107, #156
      Bartlett, TN 38134


      Black Southern civil rights activist denounces removal of Confederate Battle Flag from cemetery
      BLACK MOUNTAIN, NC -- H. K. Edgerton, a black man and former NAACP officer turned Southern activist, today lambasted a Sons of Confederate Veterans camp in Covington, Tennessee, for removing the Confederate Battle Flag from a local cemetery where it has flown for the past 12 years.
      In a public ceremony held last week, the SCV's Simonton-Wilcox Camp 257 struck the battle flag, which memorialized the cemetery's 216 Confederate dead, and replaced it with the Confederate First National Flag, known as the "Stars and Bars."  Camp Commander Robert Wallace said the flag switch was made because there is a "perception" of the flag as "a symbol of slavery and hatred" associated with the Ku Klux Klan.
      But Edgerton, who gained international fame by carrying a Confederate battle flag 1,300 miles across the South on foot in 2002, called its removal from the cemetery "a cowardly and stupid caving in to political correctness" and said that far from being a conciliatory gesture "all it does is feed the biggest cultural lie in American history and pave the way for more good Southerners to be persecuted for trying to honor their heritage."
      Edgerton is the present Chairman of the Board of Advisors of the Southern Legal Resource Center, an organization that provides legal assistance to individuals whose civil rights have been violated in cases involving Southern heritage and culture.  He called Wallace's assessment of the public's perception of the flag "absurd," adding, "The truth is that the flag you most often see the KKK waving is the good old Stars and Stripes, but nobody has suggested pulling the U.S. flag down because of a few idiots in sheets."  
      Edgerton said the current media and political campaign against the Confederate flag originated in the early 1990's.  "It was a put-up job, mostly by the NAACP, who were looking for a way to divert public attention away from their own internal troubles.  And, oh, it surely did work.  Good Southern people are being persecuted every day for showing that flag.  And here is this bunch of clowns laying down in the road, thinking to buy a little good will by substituting another flag.  It makes me sick," he said.  "I have seldom been this angry."
      Noting that Wallace said his group intends to install a new grave marker for a black Confederate soldier buried in the cemetery, Edgerton said, "Believe me, if that old black Confederate's hallowed bones could speak, they would say the best memorial Mr. Wallace could make would be his letter of resignation from the SCV."
      Edgerton is an honorary life member of the Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans.
      Source: The Southern Legal Resource Center


      Why we need free speech online
      In their crusade against 'hate speech', regulators want to subject all internet users to a system of parental controls.
      Tara McPherson has written about the problem of deep-South redneck websites - what she calls 'the many outposts of Dixie in cyberspace'. As one reads through the examples she provides of neo-Confederate eccentrics, one could be forgiven for believing that 'The South Will Rise Again', as the flags and bumper stickers put it. But by that token, the world must also be under dire threat from paedophiles, Satanists, and every other crackpot to whom the internet provides a free platform.

      'How could we narrate other versions of Southern history and place that are not bleached to a blinding whiteness?', asks McPherson, as though digital Dixie were a major social problem (17). In its present form, the internet inevitably appears to privilege the expression of marginal views, by making it so easy to express them. But the mere fact of an idea being represented online does not grant that idea any great social consequence.

      Of course, the internet has made it easier for like-minded individuals on the margins to communicate and collaborate. Mark Potok, editor of the Southern Poverty Law Centre's Intelligence Report - which 'monitors hate groups and extremist activities'- has a point when he says: 'In the 1970s and 80s the average white supremacist was isolated, shaking his fist at the sky in his front room. The net changed that.' French minister of foreign affairs Michel Barnier makes a similar point more forcefully, when he says: 'The internet has had a seductive influence on networks of intolerance. It has placed at their disposal its formidable power of amplification, diffusion and connection.' (18)


      WGST has Southern True Heritage Talk Show Host Now

      Two things:
      First WGST Radio has a talk show host who is on our side today.  Please call in now and thank them at this number.
      404 367 0640
      Also read about the disgrace of removing the Soldiers' Battleflag by the Covington Camp.   They want to go along to get along.   And Al Sharpton wasn't even there!   They installed the flag our own Confederates did away with and which represented the government.  They say the Battleflag is less than pure.   Do we have a Tyrone Brooks award?


      Sons of Confederate Veterans
      Columbia, Tennessee
      Commander-in-Chief Sweeney has requested that all of our membership be apprised that it is the policy of our organization to support the Confederate Battle Flag and defend and promote it to the best of our ability. It is our duty to educate the public as to its true meaning.
      The Battle Flag is incorporated into the logo of our organization and has a proud and honored history which is worth defending against all attacks. It is the flag that our ancestors fought and died under in order to achieve their freedom and independence. It stands as a worldwide symbol for fighting against tyranny and oppression.
      Please be aware of this in all public dealings that the Sons of Confederate Veterans are not ashamed of this flag and will not let it be furled because of today���s modern political climate.
      Brag Bowling
      Sons of Confederate Veterans


      Dees & SPLC Linked to Oklahoma City Bombing
      From: mka36@...

      Dear Chuck,
      Regarding news on the Fire Eater! website: "Morris Dees and SPLC Linked to
      Oklahoma City Bombing": http://www.fireeater.org).
      Your readers will be interested in the news reports about Morris Dees and
      the SPLC connection to the Oklahoma City bombing. Coming from the McCurtain
      Daily Gazette out of Oklahoma (reported by WorldNetDaily also). The Gazette
      has published the Motion to Dismiss legal document of the Terry Nichols
      defense team. In that document is cited a memo from the FBI Director
      (Freeh) to "Command Post" in Oklahoma. The memo implicates the SPLC as
      having an informant in a "white supremacist compound" two days before the
      OKC bombing:
      "Information has been received through the Southern Poverty Law Center
      (SPLC) that one [redacted] AKA [redacted] telephone call from [redacted] on
      or about 4/17/95, two days prior to the OKBOMB attack, when [redacted] of
      the SPLC, was in the white supremacist compound at [redacted], OK.
      [Redacted] allegedly has had a lengthy relationship with [redacted] one of
      two indicted OKBOMB defendants. [Redacted] advised that [redacted] is
      currently residing with [redacted] in [redacted] NC, and plans to leave the
      U.S. via Mexico, in the near future. [Redacted] further advised that he/she
      has learned that [redacted] for an unknown reason."
      [From the McCurtain Daily Gazette: Nichols defense motion, 26 May 2005 ]
      "According to the report in the McCurtain County, Okla., paper, the
      documents address the monitoring of the bombing by FBI informants, Alabama
      attorney Morris Dees and Dees' organization, the Southern Poverty Law
      Center." (WorldNetDaily, 26 May 2005)
      The implication of all this?
      "Writes reporter J.D. Cash in the Gazette: "If proven true, the
      ramifications of such disclosures would be far-reaching. Not only could the
      discovery of these documents lead to additional arrests and prosecutions in
      the OKC bombing case, but evidence of a cover-up of a sting operation
      involving the FBI and a private charity could ruin a number of careers of
      highly placed individuals." (WorldNetDaily, 26 May 20)
      MacDonald King Aston
      Fire Eater!



      >>On her CD of Bluegrass greats (issued in 1982), is a true BLUEGRASS version of "Dixie", which is loaded in my convertible's CD player.   With the top down ... and the all six speakers at full tilt.... whoa.... <<

      To Mr Steve in Alabama:
      May I also suggest one of the finest instrumental versions of 'Dixie' of all time and that being the hard charging recording by south Georgia's 'The Rebelaires'... You'll have those waiting at the stoplight dancing in the street with some big rebel yells!
      I will look for Miss Sandy Posey's version too.

      For a FreeFlorida,
      Robert Lloyd


      Chuck, I think Donnie Kennedy or some fire eating Southerner should run for president in 2008. As for running as a Republican or Democrat, I have serious doubts about this. These are the very same parties that have done nothing to keep the South from being degraded to its present sorry state, by design. Actually its their faults that we have been over looked & had a deaf ear turned our way all these many years. We should have OUR OWN candidates running for ALL offices EVERY election but, through a political party of our own design & choosing. The S.I.P. comes to mind as does many other Southern political parties. Our candidate���s first priority should be to get us out of this political system that loathes & despises us & only gives us lip service long enough to get our votes then promptly forgets us until they need our votes for the next election. There are some among us who will cry & wring their hands & expound on the fact that we can���t appeal to a national audience by doing this. As a national audience has never given a tinker���s damned about us & what we think my feels about this are mutual. If theses types among us are so afraid the nation at large won���t support our candidates, so be it! We will at least be the nation���s largest voting bloc which will give us a voice & get many of our ideas on the platforms of other parties. Something we don���t have now & we can at least control our states, which is where we live anyway. So let our adversaries scream bloody murder to high heaven. This is one Southerner who has & can live without their opinions of me & the South.
      Billy E. Price
      Ashville Alabama


      Confederate Veteran Marker Dedication
      The Robert S. Garnett Camp 1470 will be hosting a marker dedication for two
      Confederate soldiers buried in Sattes Cemetery, Charleston, WV.(Kanawha Co.)
      The ceremony will be held Sat., June 4th at 1:00 p.m.
      The Confederate soldiers to be honored are Pvt. George Rollins and Pvt. Henry
      Rollins, great, great grandfather and great grand uncle respectively of Fl. Div. UDC member, Ruth Mallonee.
      A special invitation to attend is extended to relatives of the above referenced Confederate veterans.  Anyone interested is invited to attend.  We may be looking for re-enactors who may want to participate.  For additional information please contact Jim Chapman at 304-756-3097 after 7:00 p.m.


      Because of their anti-Southern "diversity" program I no longer support NASCAR

      'Just wanted to let everybody know that I've had some stickers made up.  They are 1 1/2" high by 8 1/2" long, and read:
      Because of their anti-Southern "diversity" program I no longer support NASCAR
      They are high-quality black vinyl stickers with white lettering. 
      If anyone wants one, send a S.A.S.E. to:
      P.O. Box 19351
      Louisville, KY  40259-0351
      I can send up to (3) stickers PER PERSON, so if you want more than one, let me know. Bein' that I'm not chargin' for the stickers themselves, enclosing the SASE is mandatory!
      I put mine on my truck with two stickers from www.rebelstore.com; one's a big
      beautiful sparkly Naval Jack, and the other is a sticker that says simply,
      "Pride, Not Prejudice".  I've gotten some big smiles an' thumbs ups!  Made my day!


      Confederate Catechism
      From: btzoumas@...

      41. What is Lincoln's present reputation founded upon?
      It is founded upon his assassination, the need of the North for a hero, his faculty of juggling with words, and the luminous propaganda put out in his favor. Washington, Jefferson, Henry, Madison, Calhoun, and Webster attracted the admiration and recognition of the people from their earliest manhood, but in the opinion of his contemporaries Lincoln never rose above the ordinary politician, and throughout his administration he was subject to bitter and remorseless criticism. Nothing was more bitterly denounced in the North than Lincoln's suspension of the writ of habeas comps in States of the North where the courts were in full operation, and the arrest under his authority of thousands of people who were confined for months in gloomy dungeons, without charge, without trial, and without being allowed counsel. Because of this, Wendell Phillips pronounced Lincoln "a more unlimited despot than the world knows this side of China." The claim that Lincoln was a democrat, that he restored the Union, that he was a friend of the South, is the purest fiction imaginable. The deification of Lincoln commenced with his assassination, and has assumed all the forms of hero worship, without any regard for truth or even probability. The most audacious of these claims is that Lincoln was a friend of the South.

      42. Was nullification a Southern doctrine?
      No. The South as a whole never held to this doctrine. Only two Southern States, Georgia and South Carolina, ever did, and they resorted to it to make void unconstitutional acts, as an alternative to secession.
      It was not only threatened by Northern States, but practiced by them in the War of 1812, and through the personal liberty laws and the other measures in the decade from 1850 to 1860. <>
      The notion of a league implies no such idea of a State suspending a law of the Confederacy, and remaining a member thereof.
      But what makes the case of the North exceedingly ugly is that they were willing enough in 1833 to destroy the lives of South Carolinians, find resorted to the nullification policy in 1850-1860, in clear defiance of constitutional provisions, for a mere idea and without any sense of personal injury. The men of New England were wholly averse to fighting foreign soldiers like Englishmen in 1812-1814, and Mexicans in 1846, but were among the first in the field to punish their brethren, the Southerners, in 1861.

      43. What was the true nature of the Union in 1861?
      I.   In May, 1777, the Legislature of Virginia passed an act requiring all free-born male citizens, above the age of 16 years, to "swear allegiance to the Commonwealth of Virginia as a free and independent State," and the other States, or most of them certainly, passed similar laws. No one was required by any authority to swear allegiance to the United States, or its government. In 1781, the Articles of Confederation, adopted that year, called the Union "a firm league of friendship," and provided that each State "retained its sovereignty, freedom and independence." In the treaty of peace (1783), Great Britain recognized the United States, mentioning the thirteen States by name, as "free, sovereign and independent States." Nevertheless, Lincoln, with characteristic sophistry, tried to fool people into thinking that the States had never been sovereign.
      But against his views may be placed the facts, and the opinion of another man of national ideas, far his superior in every way - John Marshall - who in a noted case (Gibbons versus Ogden), declared the Union previous to 1787 a league.
      II.   John Marshall never resorted to rhetoric or dishonest sophistical argument like Lincoln, but his intense party spirit led him often unto untenable positions. As a member of the Federalist party, he espoused the British doctrine, "once a citizen, always a citizen," denied the Jeffersonian slogan "free ships make free goods," wanted, like the other Federalists, to make the common law a part of the law of the United States, and stood for aristocracy, instead of democracy, as the correct principle of government. All Marshall's views on these subjects stand repudiated by even the present intensely consolidated government of the United States.
      So when in the same case (Gibbons vs. Ogden) he reasoned that under the new constitution the Union lost the character of a league, he simply spoke as father to the thought, and .appeared to forget that, if the Union was a league of sovereign States anterior to 1787, as he said it was, the States could not lose that character without some express provision in the new constitution to that effect. It is a fundamental provision of public law that in construing grants from sovereign States, nothing can pass by mere implication or inference (Brown's Legal Maxims, p. 260); Vattel, 2nd Book, chapter SVII, sect. 305-308). And this is especially true when the grant concerns so serious a matter as the sovereignty of the State.
      Now no one can show any express revocation of sovereignty in the constitution, and Marshall's argument proceeds by way of implication or inference from powers in the constitution which may be explained wholly otherwise. To reason that from a mere change in the operation of the government or distribution of the powers, the sovereignty can be destroyed, is absurd.
      There is no real antagonism between a Federal government of despotic power and a Union of sovereign States, and the difference between the articles of Confederation and the Constitution of 1787 lies not in the nature of the Union but in the grants of power. To render this perfectly plain, suppose there was a clause added to the present constitution, "And this Union is a league from which each State may peaceably withdraw," how would this provision interfere with the operation of the Federal government, as long as the States chose to remain together?
      The Confederate Constitution was a mere copy of the Federal Constitution, created "a government proper," but no one has denied that its object was to establish a league of sovereign States.
      III.   Not only was there no express provision in the constitution or the amendments by which the States surrendered their sovereignty, but there were provisions in it which declare and defend that sovereignty. The seventh article declares that the parties to this constitution are "the States so ratifying the same," and the tenth amendment repels all implications hostile to sovereignty by declaring that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited to the States are reserved to the States or the people respectively." No one was ever required by the Constitution to swear allegiance to the Federal government or the United States.  


      Poem- appeal for soldier's home-1899

      This is another great poem from the year 1899. It was found in the Confederate Veterans magazine, page 88 of the compiled editions from Broadfoot Publishing Company.
      Mr. Luther Manship was standing with some friends on a street corner in Jackson, Miss., sometime ago when an old Confederate, battle-scarred and feeble, appealed to him for direction to the Soldiers' Home. Mississippi has never provided a home for her Confederate veterans, so the old man turned away pained and disappointed. Mr. Manship afterwards wrote this poem:

      A battle-scarred old veteran, one who had worn the gray
      And fought beneath the Southern flag with glory as his pay,
      Now bent with age and worn by time, stands waiting at the door,
      And asks his State for shelter- he's homeless, old, and poor.
      Each scar upon his battered frame will eloquently tell
      How, answering his State's behest, he fought where foemen fell.
      No straggler in the line was he, but, like the knight of old,
      The crash of arms for sacred cause was music to his soul.
      When thunders of secession were heard on every hand,
      From the war clouds that had gathered above our sunny land,
      And roaring guns on Sumter the jarring sections woke,
      Till peace at Appomattox rolled back the battle smoke,
      This veteran stood to duty like the needle to 'the pole,
      And went wherever duty led through hardships never told.
      He 'comes now with a shambling step, of health, of all, bereft,
      And asks the State to help him o'er the few short years that are left.
      But the men who make the laws and crowd our halls of state
      Have failed to offer him a home, and so he'll have to wait
      Until some kindly hand shall lead him from the storm,
      That breaks above his hoary head and racks his tired form.
      The State is poor, they tell us; ah! she must be poor indeed,
      To see such heroes suffer and not supply their need.
      Hard is the fate of the infirm and poor, sad to be thus denied,
      But short the passage to the friendly tomb, where the burden is laid aside.
      Old veteran, you must stand aside! you're thirty years too late;
      With a pittance for a pension, we leave you to your fate.
      Yet history, in coming years, these truthful words shall say:
      God never chastened braver men than those who wore the gray.
      On Chickamauga's bloody field, at Malvern Hill, as well,
      In fact, upon a hundred fields, these heroes fought and fell.
      Full many sleep in unmarked graves and will till judgment day,
      But God, the giver of all good, will not o'erlook the gray. 


      HK Edgerton Critical Of TN SCV Camp For Removing
      The Confederate Battle Flag

      Burn myths, but not crosses
      See, it's times like this when the oft-offensive Confederate flag becomes even more of a lightning rod.

      Morris Dees and the Oklahoma City Bombing
      MacDonald King Aston
      Morris Dees and the Oklahoma City Bombing: Reference Materials

      FBI has secret docs it's reluctant to give up
      Judge ordered disclosure of info on informants that could shed light on Oklahoma City tragedy

      National Civil War Museum Explores History of 'Taps'

      Fortune seekers scour North America in search of Confederate stash

      New Generation, New View of Race Relations
      Jeff Adams

      Send alerts to:
      wmshnv@the southernamerican.org

      Things of Southern Interest

      River Walk Heritage Violation
      Post your Southern events, fundraisers, meetings, etc. FREE

      7th Mississippi Volunteer Infantry Regiment

      "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are:
      "I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
      Ronald Reagan.
      RESPECT LIFE:  From Womb to Tomb!    ~mary~
    • ~mary~
      SOUTHERN HERITAGE NEWS & VIEWS is dedicated to the preservation of Southern Heritage and to defend the honour of our Confederate ancestors. It is FREE
      Message 331 of 331 , Sep 7, 2006
        SOUTHERN HERITAGE NEWS & VIEWS is dedicated   to the preservation of Southern Heritage and   to defend the honour of our Confederate ancestors.   It is FREE and sent to you via E-mail.  To subscribe send blank e-mail to:  SouthernHeritage-subscribe@...      STAY ON THE CUTTING EDGE OF THE HERITAGE   BATTLE WITH OUR NEWS, OPINIONS AND UPDATES      Dixie Outfitters is working every day to   preserve our Southern heritage. When you   buy Dixie Outfitters apparel you are helping   in the effort to honor our ancestors and safeguard   our Southern way of life.   Buy the original and the best, Dixie Outfitters.  CALL TOLL FREE: 866-916-5866 for your free   color catalog or to place an order.  Visit our web site at: http://www.dixieoutfitters.com      REBEL YELL ON
         LINE   Your Source for Standard and Unique Rebel Merchandise  such as Redneck Gift Baskets and Dixie Birdhouses.  http://www.rebelyellonline.com/      
        Op-ed submission ref. Gettysburg 09/02/06
        Per our telephone conversation, the following is submitted:

        In "The battle over flag's meaning" (York Daily Record, Sunday, 09/03/06) following the protests by the 37th Texas Cavalry and others against the Klan’s appearance at the Gettysburg battlefield the York Daily Record wrote, "The Klan's counter-protesters were organizations that honor the heritage of fighting a war to protect slavery."

        With that statement a newspaper that was otherwise objective attempted to discredit honorable individuals and organizations by repeating flawed folklore rather than history.

        There was never a war fought in America to protect slavery just as there was never a war fought to end slavery.

        Northerners like to get the warm fuzzy feeling from the legend that they fought a noble war to end slavery while Southerners reminisce wistfully about states’ rights.

        Both are wrong.

        There was a war fought to resist ruinous taxation.  By 1860 the revenues from export tariffs on Southern raw goods and import duties on European finished goods had the South providing nearly 70% of the Federal budget.  Almost 90% of that budget was then spent to aid growing Northern industrialization.

        Southern agrarian states lacked the number of  Senators and Congressmen to resist wave after wave of targeted tariffs, taxes and duties which saw most great planatations either bankrupt or teetering on the verge of bankruptcy by 1860.

        In 1861 President-Elect Lincoln lobbied and pushed through a proposed Consitutional amendment to protect slavery forever (Corwin Amendment - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corwin_amendment).  Two State legislatures ratified it:  Ohio on May 13, 1861; followed by Maryland on January 10, 1862. Illinois bungled its ratification by holding a convention.  

        The South could have returned to the Union, helped ratify this Amendment and been victorious in fact and in principle IF the protection of slavery had been their cause for secession.  They did not.

        In his December, 1862, State of the Union Address Lincoln offered the South gradual compensated emancipation with slavery lasting until 1900.  Again the South refused this offer to protect slavery and Lincoln issued his hypocrtical “Emancipation Proclamation” only after this offer failed.

        Neither of these offers to protect slavery brought the South back into the Union - inexplicable if the South was “fighting a war to protect slavery.”

        The “Emancipaton Proclamation” did not free a single slave nor was it intended to do so.  Union slave states remained unaffected as did areas of the South controlled by Union forces and even the entire Confederate state of Tennessee.  Because of the language in the proclamation approximately 800,000 slaves remained in bondage in the North and South until December, 1865, almost eight months after Lee surrendered - meaning that the United States was the last slave nation in North America.

        European nations saw clearly what was happening.

        "...So Englishmen saw it. Lincoln's insincerity was regarded as proven by two things: his earlier denial of any lawful right or wish to free the slaves; and, especially, his not freeing the slaves in 'loyal' Kentucky and other United States areas or even in Confederate areas occupied by United States troops, such as New Orleans."  - The Glittering Illusion: English Sympathy for the Southern Confederacy, Sheldon Vanauken, 1989, Washington, DC: Regnery/Gateway

        The unsegregated Confederate Army included 13,000 Indians (one a Brigadier General), 6500 Hispanics (nine Colonels), 3500 Jews (including the Secretary of State), tens of thousands of foreign-born, Filipinos from Lousiana, Amerasians and many Black Southerners (Free and slave) who were documented fighting for the South.

        "Almost fifty years before the (Civil) War, the South was already enlisting and utilizing Black manpower, including Black commissioned officers, for the defense of their respective states.  Therefore, the fact that Free and slave Black Southerners served and fought for their states in the Confederacy cannot be considered an unusual instance, rather continuation of an established practice with verifiable historical precedence."  - "The African-American Soldier: From Crispus Attucks to Colin Powell" by Lt. Col [Ret.] Michael Lee Lanning

        Were these Black Southerners - many of them among the quarter-million Free People of Color in the South by 1860 - “fighting to protect slavery?”  They were regularly enlisted in the Confederate Army from the first days of the War because they saw the War as did Southerners and European observers:

        "For this war is essentially a war of conquest. If ever a nation did wage such a war, the North is now engaged, with a determination worthy of a more hopeful cause, in endeavoring to conquer the South..." - Col. James Arthur Lyon Fremantle, Coldstream Guards, British Army - "Three Months in the Southern States: April, June, 1863"

        Last Sunday’s editorial attempting to discredit wholesale those who stand against hate proves before one writes one should at least be minimally educated in the topic.  In this case the writer and the York Daily Record failed miserably.

        We simply ask that all act upon the facts of history.

        Michael Kelley
        Commanding, 37th Texas Cavalry (Terrell's)


        Letters to the editor
        Roanoke Times, VA

        Pride and hate aren't related
        In his Aug. 29 letter to the editor, "One nation, indivisible," I couldn't help but laugh at Ryan McCarren calling people "Confederates."
        So, should I call him a "Yankee" or "Federal" for his Union heritage?
        I do have a problem with McCarren's comment, "'heritage, not hate' is a bunch of nonsense."
        Is he saying that people who fly the Confederate flag or take pride in their ancestors are filled with hate?
        True, there are better symbols to represent Southern heritage, and unfortunately the Confederate flag has been tainted by its use by certain organizations.
        McCarren's comment, "it was slavery, plain and simple" -- c'mon.
        Yes, slavery was a big issue, but it was also something that was dying when the Civil War began.
        Maybe he should consider the thought that only 20 percent of Southerners owned slaves, with an even smaller percentage possessing numerous slaves.
        Does that justify slavery? No, it was wrong, but here's something to think about:
        Why did so many Southern men fight if they didn't own slaves? What was the motivation for the average working man to fight for his home, state and rights?
        We need to be cautious of blanket statements.

        Respecting heritage
        I read with great interest Ryan McCarren's Aug. 29 letter to the editor, "One nation, indivisible," and two points really stood out.
        n He felt the need to "honor his Union heritage (who wouldn't have guessed) and the brave men who fought to preserve the Union," but would deny the same privilege to Southerners.
        n He was absolutely sure he knew why the war was fought.
        For his information, "heritage, not hate" is not a bunch of nonsense but a sense of pride in our heritage.
        Also, for his information, at least 80 percent of the Confederate army was comprised of men who didn't even own one slave and never expected to do so.
        My opinion is that McCarren's lack of knowledge is only exceeded by his arrogance.
        S.M. DURRANT



        Part 1. Treatment of prisoners IN THE CONFEDERACY
        Issue 1. FROM THE GRAY BOOK
        By Matthew Page Andrews
        Author of the History of The United States, Dixie Book of Days, &C, &C.
        Only a generation ago, Raphael Semmes, commander of the Confederate warship Alabama, was widely advertised as a"pirate"and Robert E. Lee was stigmatized as a "traitor." Thousands of young Americans were taught so to regard these Southern leaders. Now, however , these terms are nearly obsolete; while many Northern historians, such as Charles Francis Adams, who fought on the Federal side in the War of Secession, and Gamaliel Bradford, who grew up after the war, have delighted in honoring Lee and other Southern leaders as Americans whose character and achievements are the ennobling heritage of a united Nation.
        It was more or less natural that Americans should have been led astray of the truth in the heat of sectional strife and partisan
        expression. Misconceptions have arisen out of every war. In fifty years, however, Americans have made progress in overcoming war prejudices than the people of other lands in the twice or thrice that period.
        This is encouraging, yet the fact that the greater number of our textbooks, and consequently our schools, teach that "the cause for which the South fought was unworthy:" that the Southern leaders "were laboring under some of the most curious hallucinations which a student of history meets in the whole course of his researches ;" and that "the South was the champion of the detested institution of slavery," indicates a lamentable state of historical ignorance on the part of those who should know better. The characters of the Southern leaders are longer aspersed but their motives are besmirched or clouded and their cause unjustly condemned because it is still widely misunderstood*(1).
        Furthermore, since the beginning of the World War of 1914, the conduct of the Prussians, together with the character of their cause, has been compared with the character of the Confederate conduct of the War of Secession, together with the cause and character of Southern statesman. Reputable magazines of wide circulation and writers of prominence have compared the Confederate treatment of prisoners with Prussian outrages in Belgium and France. American newspapers also have printed literally thousands of such comparative references. Fortunately, nine-tenths of these comparisons have been made through ignorance of the facts and not through any malicious desire of the authors to defame the fair name of a single fellow-American on the Confederate side or the "lost cause" which he represented with unsurpassed devotion and valor.
        Side by side with these accusations, in some cases, generous praise is bestowed upon the former "pirate" Semmes as having furnished a model for warfare on the high seas; and it is freely stated that his observance of all requirements of international custom and of the dictates of humanity in civilized warfare held not only to the letter, but also the full spirit of the law. It is not denied, also, that Lee, the Confederate chieftain and quondam "traitor" has offered the noblest example of orders of conduct for an army in the enemy’s country that all history can show, and that these orders were also carried out "even to the protection of a farmer’s fence rails!" The Boston Transcript, for example, took occasion, in 1917, to publish these orders in full.
        Nevertheless, in regard to the treatment of prisoners, the sweeping condemnation of James G. Blaine, delivered in an outburst of war-inspired and partisan condemnation of the South is still, in a general way, believed by Americans who have, of late, been echoing them, although in milder terms and in limitation of the number of those held to have been guilty. Mr Blaine declared some ten years after the war: "Mr Davis [President of the Confederate States] was the author, knowingly, deliberately, guiltily, and willfully, of the gigantic murder and crime at Andersonville. And I here, before God measuring my words, knowing their full extent and import declare that neither the deeds of the Duke of Alva in the low countries, nor the massacre of Saint Bartholomew, nor the thumb screws and engines of torture of the Spanish Inquisition, begin to compare in atrocity with the hideous crimes of Andersonville."
        Historians do not now accept this statement as true, solemnly made as it was by a man who, a few years later, barely missed election to the highest office in the gift of the people of the United States. Furthermore, American historians, even if inclined to bias, do not now go into any detail in the matter of these charges. They refer the reader, however, to a mass of matter(,) the major part of which is as false today as when James G. Blaine based upon it his colossal libel of Jefferson Davis and the military and civil authorities of the Southern Confederacy. As above stated, the so-called "general" historian has dropped this matter in detail, though Mr. Blaine exclaimed dramatically that it would remain as the "blackest page" in the annals of all time.*(2)
        On the other hand, innumerable monographs have been written upon this subject, four-fifths of which are either false per se, or based on false evidence such as that which has misled so many Americans from the time of James G. Blaine and contemporary historians, to editors of and writers in magazines and newspapers of the second decade in the twentieth century. With this one notable exception, American history is rapidly freeing its narrative of misconception in all its phases. It is here that we now find the last great stronghold of sectional misconception.
        If four-fifths of the monographs on prison life in the South are false per se, are based on false evidence, it follows that one-fifth are true or approximately so. The writer has had the privilege of knowing personally a distinguished Union Veteran who suffered privations at Libby Prison. Published in 1912, his story, as it affects his personal experiences, is doubtless true in every respect; yet this same good American helped to publish simultaneously another volume by one of his comrades that is a tissue of falsehood and slander from beginning to end. The voracious author seemed to take his mendacious comrade at his face value, and he advertised as worthy history a gross historical libel.*(3)
        The charges preferred against the authorities of the Confederacy were, for several years, made the most important subject under consideration by the people and even the government of the United States. During that period, the magnitude and violence of the accusations obscured much more weighty and serious problems and placed the South on the defensive, because it was not better element in the North but the radical and partisan minority that had, for the moment, the ear of the country and the world.
        Again with reference to a portion of the truthful fifth part of the testimony in monographs or special articles, it should be said that a concerted attempt has apparently been made by certain interested individuals and groups to cry down, suppress, or defame the authors.


        "All the South has ever desired was that the union, as established by our forefathers, should be preserved; and that the government, as originally organized, should be administered in purity and truth."
        ~~ Gen. Robert E. Lee 1866


        You might be a Yankee if... 
        You take the Wall Street Journal so your neighbors will see it in your driveway.


        Rally sparks debate over flag
        "The Klan's counter-protesters were organizations that honor the heritage of fighting a war to protect slavery."
        Southern Poverty Law Center

        Google opens up 200 years of news 
        The news archive search is one of several new Google services
        Web giant Google is further expanding its online empire with the launch of the Google News Archive Search.
        BBC NEWS

        Museum, donor settle differences
        Lacombe man to take back his flag, other items
        Times Picayune, LA

        Books by Clint Johnson

        SCV Camp 813's
        Battle at Zachary Hill
        Saturday September 9, 2006

        Civil War Days
        Glen Allen, VA.
        Sept 9-10 2006

        Rail Excursion To Chickamauga War Between The States Days Festival Sept. 16
        The Chattanoogan
        POW Day, CSA
        Petersburg, VA
        4:00 pm to 5:00 pm
        September 16, 2006


        Southern Heritage News & Views  Keeping You Informed  http://www.thesouthernamerican.org/SHNV.html      SOUTHERN EVENTS CALENDAR  Post your Southern events, fundraisers,   meetings, etc. FREE  http://pub19.bravenet.com/calendar/show.php?usernum=1560065017      Southern Heritage News & Views Hot Spot  Check here often for breaking news between newsletters.  http://shnv.blogspot.com/      SHNV ARCHIVES  YahooGroups   8-12-1999 thru 1-14-2001  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SouthernHeritage/  Topica  3-27-2001 thru today  http://lists.topica.com/lists/southernheritage/read      Link Partners of SHNV  http://www.thesouthernamerican.org/SHNV.html       *******    

        Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive & well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, Champagne in one hand, strawberries in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "What a Ride!" ~mary~
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.