Re: [solarisx86] A dumb question; and another one, less technical this time
- First questions first:
What type of servers do they have (you mention Ultra24s)?
Is there a need to upgrade?
Do they still have support contracts?
And, yes, there is a special research&development pricelist, but, as others
mentioned, it's best to ask an Oracle sales rep (or partner).
You (Marc Lobelle) wrote:
> Thanks for your contributions to this 32 vs 64 bis discussion.--
> I have another dumb quastion:
> There is a university in West Africa, that runs 10 to 20 servers running
> old (SUN era) versions of Solaris.
> The question is (knowing that money is scarce over there): should they
> upgrade to solaris 11.1 or openidiana.
> I looked at the price for licences (called Oracle Solaris Premier
> Subscriptions for Non-Oracle* *x86 Systems) (older servers are SUN: Sun
> used to be cheap for universities; newer ones are assembled by a small
> belgian company, but it is simpler to consider them all alike).
> Le's assume they have 20 servers each with two sockets. Do they need 20
> licenses for 1-4 sockets systems (i.e. 20.000 $/year) or consider the
> note on Oracle's site about 5+ sockets licences: I quote:
> /"Note, this subscription is based on the number of sockets in the
> system. When ordering, enter the number of sockets in the quantity
> field. You can include multiple systems on the same order by entering
> the total quantity of sockets you need to purchase. /"
> ie cumulate the number of sockets, i.e. 40 and consider that the minimum
> order of 4 times "5+" means unlimited number of sockets and that
> whatever the number of servers they add in the future they would have to
> pay 8000$ a year, ie 400$ a year per server (less if they have more
> servers), which already about twice the annual maintenance contract of
> my ULTRA24s ?
> Or would, by miracle, Oracle have more advantageous conditions for
> developing countries universities ?
> Thanks in advance for your advices
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Please check the Links page before posting:
> Post message: email@example.com
> UNSUBSCRIBE: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Yahoo! Groups Links
Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49 171 4735638 | Mißerfolg ist lediglich eine
Waldstrasse 6 | mailto:Matthias@... | Gelegenheit, mit neuen
D-61440 Oberursel | AIM: pfuetz, ICQ: 300967487 | Ansichten noch einmal
Germany | http://www.pfuetzner.de/matthias/ | anzufangen. Henry Ford
- In message <823216AA177D7D44AB431E36B09FB63B13F6ADB9@...>,
Stuart Biggar writes:
>As of today (19 Feb), it appears that the JRE has been further updated to UpdaBTW Martin Paul's PCA reports these patches for S10:
>15 but the JDK is still at Update 13. I found that running the "Verify Java v
118668 41 < 42 RS- 2 JavaSE 5.0_x86: update 40 patch (equivalent to JDK 5.0u40)
118669 41 < 42 RS- 2 JavaSE 5.0_x86: update 40 patch (equivalent to JDK 5.0u40), 64bit
125138 42 < 44 RS- 2 JavaSE 6_x86: update 41 patch (equivalent to JDK 6u41)
125139 42 < 44 RS- 2 JavaSE 6_x86: update 41 patch (equivalent to JDK 6u41), 64bit
147694 13 < 15 RS- 1 JavaSE 7_x86: update 15 patch (equivalent to JDK 7u15)
147695 13 < 15 RS- 1 JavaSE 7_x86: update 15 patch (equivalent to JDK 7u15), 64bit