Re: [solarisx86] Re: What I'd like to see done with Solaris x64 by Oracle if they keep it..
- Dave Johnson: wrote
> In technology, you follow and you die. Lead.In which way you lead? Having a closed source
>I'm with pcsol1996 on all 3 points.
OS that is used by a handful of people is almost
useless. ZFS became popular because it is an
OpenSource project and so it is available under
OpenBSD and Linux (through FUSE) and
it will become the da facto file system of MacOS.
If it were a close source thing, no one would care about
it! "Protectionism" is not the way to go.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, John Taylor <jbt.oldemail@...> wrote:
>The arrogance is rather alarming. Much like the recent posts here that indicate AI developers refuse to listen to input from real world sys-admins.
> is a laugh. Issues in failsafe mode, live upgrade, and the regular
> comments from the Sun mailing list peanut gallery saying "you shouldn't
> be using a separate /var file system" is clear indication of the
> level of acceptance for it inside of Sun.
> I have to talk to support. More than once I have had to get moved to another
> support engineer who isn't doing his best to be a road block. And it's
> clear the from the mailing list that they are singing a different tune than
> what you suggest will happen.
>Well I can't go back 20 years in UNIX, but in 11 years..never.
> I've *never* had to delete and recreate a UFS file system to recover
> lost space. In 20 years, never.