Re: [softrock40] Assembling the SoftRock v6.2 80m&40m RXTX kit
- Hi to All,
I just received my 2 RXTX 6.2 kits and they appear to be very professional
and well explained. I must admit as a 71 year old accomplished kit
(standard components) and homebrewer that this is going to be the ultimate
challenge of 2007 for me. It looks like fun and a source of great pride to
put one of these kits together and I am looking forward to it - just hope I
don't smoke the project.
So in the spirit of 2007 - Thanks Tony for the challenge and opportunity to
participate in this great project - I would never be able to design this and
produce at the cost your are providing them at.
73, Ray, N0FY
- At 6:56 pm ((PDT)) Thu Oct 4, 2007, aisea6 wrote:
>There is a difference in component values in the BOM listing withNope, not in mine.
>what is printed in the circuit
>e.g"i.e." - or are there more you are not telling us about?
> BOM circuitWhat are you reading?
>C37 3300pf 680pf
>C18 470PF 220PF
Please ensure that your schematic and BOM filenames
and titles match the band kit you are trying to build,
<RXTXv6.2 40m 80m sheet 1 6_8.pdf>
<RXTXv6.2 40m 80m sheet 2 6_8.pdf>
"G0BBL-M0PUB-G8BTR 40m/80m RXTXv6.2"
<RXTXv6.2 BOM 40m 80m 6_8.pdf>
"Bill of materials for SoftRock RXTXv6.2 board, 40m / 80m Kit"
>Is there an up date BOM or a circuit diagram regarding the componentI downloaded my copies virtually as soon as they were announced
by Tony and they are June 08 versions, cf. the filenames: "...6_8".
C18 = 220pF & C37 = 680pF - no need for an update there.
>Please advice.There have been many SoftRock versions and hence a multitude
of documentation titles - plus variations group members invent ;-)
You need to keep your wits about you to be sure you are thinking
and someone else is writing about the same SoftRock version.
* Please interleave reply text and trim quotes not needed for context