72178Re: [softrock40] Re: USB sound card dongle with stereo INPUT
- Feb 9, 2013On 2/9/2013 4:05 PM, Alan wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----Hi Alan,
> Subject: Re: [softrock40] Re: USB sound card dongle with stereo INPUT
>> I suspect that what you claim is true if you are receiving amplitude
>> modulated signals. However, if you are receiving a digital signal, such
>> as WSPR, won't the additional bits help in the signal processing gain?
>> Since WSPR can detect signals with more than -20 dB S/N, I would think
>> that 24 bit resolution would produce better results that 16 bit
My comments inserted below--
> The way I understand it is that 24 bits does not give better resolution.24 bits does give better resolution than 16 bits. Most modern A to D
> But it gives a greater dynamic range.
> I have not heard anyone suggest that 24 bits on it's own improves the reception of weak signals.
converters can digitize a signal whose peak to peak value is less than
the supply voltage for the ADC (typically 5V). The minimum signal that
can be quantized is 2^N times smaller than the largest signal. This is
the "resolution" of the device. For N equal to 16 bits, the smallest
signal is 65535 times smaller than the largest signal. For N equal to
24 bits (most 24 bit ADC do not have a true 24 bit range, but an
"effective number of bits" that is less--e.g. 21 bits), the smallest
signal that can be resolved is more than 16 million times smaller than
the largest signal. We typically refer to dynamic range as the ratio of
the largest signal (which is frequently independent of the number of
bits) to the smallest signal that can be quantized. Therefore the 24
bit ADC has both improved resolution, and improved dynamic range.
> My observations seem to show that the noise from the Softrock opamps is greater than the noise from a low noise soundcard. AndThis is generally true, unless you are fortunate to live in an area that
> greater than antenna noise at higher frequencies, maybe above 21MHz.
has exceptionally low environmental noise (received from the antenna).
> Others have said that reducing the opamp gain in the Softrock does enable low noise 24 bit cards to increase the dynamic range.This is not increasing the dynamic range of the ADC, but is merely
shifting the signal levels to utilize as much of the range of the ADC as
possible. You may, however, sacrifice some of the weak signal
capability of the ADC.
> Without modification a Softrock will not benefit much, if anything, from a 24 bit card.I still believe that, when operating some of the sophisticated digital
> 73 Alan G4ZFQ
modes that require substantial signal processing, there is an advantage
to using 24 bit ADCs. Even though noise is present, you need to be able
to resolve tiny changes in the combination of signal and noise. By
averaging (integrating) numerous samples of signal plus noise, you are
able to suppress the effects of the noise. This, of course, assumes
that the noise is uncorrelated with the desired signal, and that the
noise has zero average value. (I won't comment on techniques that are
used when the noise does not meet this criteria).
For the typical CW or SSB user, I would agree that most would not
experience a significant improvement when going from 16 bit to 24 bit ADCs.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>