UDDI v2/3 support (Re: [soaplite] SOAP::Lite 0.65 Development Update)
- View SourceMark,
--- Mark Fuller <amigo_boy2000@...> wrote:
> I've used the v2 support from the CVS with 60a. ItJust let us know what you think needs to be done/rethought. Given
> works fine. I'll try it as distributed with the beta
> of 65. Regarding v3 support, I haven't had access to a
> v3 server until lately. But, from reading the v3 specs
> I've got a feeling UDDI::Lite will need some
> rethinking to handle some new features in v3. We'll
> have to tackle that later. Not a big deal because v3
> servers like Systinet's should be able to handle v2
> and resolve the differences (like required fields in
this I won't be implementing any changes in handling non-UDDI
namespaces (to be used in v3) described here
> I noticed the UDDI::Lite documentation Byrne postedAs far as I remember it's a matter of using uddiversion parameter
> doesn't mention how to select v1, 2 or 3. Do you guys
> want to update it to address the way the module was
> changed? Or, do you want me to? I think the only
> difference was the "use" pragma.
with 'use UDDI::Lite'. Either of us can come up with one or two
examples showing that. It would be great if you could write a working
example with a real v2 server.
We probably need to move this thread to soaplite-devel list (cc-ed).