Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [soaplite] trace calling convention docs wrong?

Expand Messages
  • ed-soaplite@inkdroid.org
    ... It s always worth updating flawed docmentation as well.
    Message 1 of 4 , May 24, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 05:02:15PM +0000, Duncan Cameron wrote:
      > It's always worth trawling the archives when you have a problem to
      > see whether it's been seen before. The only difficulty is choosing
      > the search words!

      It's always worth updating flawed docmentation as well.
    • Duncan Cameron
      ... Hash: SHA1 ... Yes! See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soaplite/message/2526 and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soaplite/message/1741 It s always worth
      Message 2 of 4 , May 24, 2003
      • 0 Attachment
        -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
        Hash: SHA1

        On 2003-05-23 19:02:00 kgoess <kgoess@...> wrote:

        >Has anybody else noticed that the docs that say you can do this:
        >
        >use SOAP::Lite +trace =>
        > method, fault => \&log_methods_and_faults;
        >
        >are wrong? It actually has to be this
        >
        >use SOAP::Lite +trace =>
        > [ method, fault => \&log_methods_and_faults ];

        Yes!

        See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soaplite/message/2526
        and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soaplite/message/1741

        It's always worth trawling the archives when you have a problem to
        see whether it's been seen before. The only difficulty is choosing
        the search words!

        Regards
        Duncan

        -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
        Version: PGP 6.5.1i for non-commercial use <http://www.pgpi.com/>

        iQA/AwUBPs+XXTb+nTRZp0R7EQLq4wCgyxAd+7IqV/Y9XWTwyxkvhF7FJa0AoLZH
        ulSRsAj8jKQUb7sXYWvDj64D
        =qSmA
        -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
      • Duncan Cameron
        ... Absolutely. The problem seems to be that Paul K hasn t the time these days. Regards Duncan
        Message 3 of 4 , May 24, 2003
        • 0 Attachment
          On 2003-05-24 11:06:00 ed-soaplite <ed-soaplite@...> wrote:

          >On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 05:02:15PM +0000, Duncan Cameron wrote:
          >> It's always worth trawling the archives when you have a problem to
          >> see whether it's been seen before. The only difficulty is choosing
          >> the search words!
          >
          >It's always worth updating flawed docmentation as well.
          >
          Absolutely. The problem seems to be that Paul K hasn't the time
          these days.

          Regards
          Duncan
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.