Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3833Re: SOLUTION: [soaplite] SOAP::Lite server with .NET client - SOAPAction woes

Expand Messages
  • wxyc
    Aug 12 8:16 AM
      Issac -

      I am having a similar problem on making a client(in Axis/Java 1.1)
      call a SOAP::Lite server, and your post is helpful.

      However, by following your advices, the problem is not gone.

      My WS server is deployed in the static mode and is not a WSDL-type
      server . Here is the code:

      #! /usr/local/bin/perl -w
      use SOAP::Transport::HTTP;
      use lib ("/nas/dev/test/testSoap/");
      use EchoYa qw(echoYa);

      $SIG{PIPE} = $SIG{INT} = 'IGNORE';

      $daemon = SOAP::Transport::HTTP::Daemon
      -> new (LocalPort => 8003)
      -> dispatch_to('EchoYa');

      The EchoYa.pm is like this:
      package EchoYa;

      require Exporter;
      @ISA = qw(Exporter);
      @EXPORT = qw( echoYa );

      sub echoYa {
      print "enter echoYa\n";
      my $self = shift;
      my $ya = shift;
      return "I got $ya!";

      I changed the relevent line of the client to set the SOAPAction as
      "urn:EchoYa#echoYa", I still got an error:

      SOAPAction shall match 'uri#method' if present (got
      'urn:EchoYa#echoYa', expected '#echoYa'

      You post sounds like you have a WSDL serveice written in SOAP::Lite.
      How did you do that? because SOAP::Lite does not really provide bolts
      and nuts for writing a WSDL server?



      --- In soaplite@yahoogroups.com, "Issac Goldstand" <margol@b...>
      > MessageThanks for all the suggestions. I will attempt to include
      lots of details in this response for the sake of the archives.
      > My original suspicion was that the MS type namespaces (eg / instead
      of #, or "s or lack thereof, or urn: or http:, etc) were not the
      issue, as the *server* is the part that cares about the namespace, and
      to properly create a proxy from WSDL, any toolkit regardless of the
      underlying framwork, need to take the WSDL and just *do what it says*

      > Futher, using "urn:MyApp" tends to be important when talking to
      SOAP::Lite, using the format of "urn:Foo/Bar#baz" may be important,
      simply because when dispatching (I think both dynamicly and staticly)
      the SOAP calls to the actually methods, SOAP::Lite translates
      everything between "urn:" and "#" to the class, substituting "/" for
      "::", and everything after "#" as the method name. For example:
      > soapAction="urn:Foo/Bar#Baz" becomes Foo::Bar::baz (or baz in
      package Foo::Bar if that wasn't clear)
      > soapAction="urn:MyApp#Method" becomes MyApp::Method
      > etc
      > Also, there are lots of mentions in the archives and in the
      SOAP::Lite docs seemingly saying that MS doesn't play nicely with RPC
      type operations, but I've encoutnered no problems with it; quite the
      > As it turns out, my problem was that MS requires the namespace to be
      explicitly defined wherever possible. In my final (working) WSDL, the
      namespace of wsdl had to be set to "urn:MyApp" (I also set
      targetNamespace to "urn:MyApp"), and each "main" section needed to be
      fully qualified (see below for snippet). Additionally, in the
      bindings section, each operation's input/output/etc "body" needs to
      have the namespace fully qualified (eg < soap:body "urn:MyApp:Method"
      ... />)
      > Also, make sure to use UTF-8, as I sometimes had crashes when
      talking utf-16 to SOAP::Lite from MS...
      > the WSDL structure should thus be as follows:
      > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      > <wsdl:definitions name="MyApp" targetNamespace="urn:MyApp"
      xmlns="urn:MyApp" xmlns:tns="urn:MyApp"
      xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" ... >
      > <wsdl:message name="MethodRequest">
      > <wsdl:part name="somePart" type="xsd:string"/>
      > ...
      > </wsdl:message>
      > <wsdl:portType name="MyAppPortType">
      > <wsdl:operation name="Method">
      > <wsdl:input message="tns:MethodRequest"/>
      > <wsdl:output message="tns:MethodResponse"/>
      > </wsdl:operation>
      > ...
      > </wsdl:portType>
      > <wsdl:binding name="MyAppBinding" type="tns:MyAppPortType">
      > <soap:binding style="rpc"
      > <wsdl:operation name="Method">
      > <soap:operation soapAction="urn:MyApp#Method"
      > <wsdl:input>
      > <soap:body namespace="urn:MyApp" use="literal"/>
      > </wsdl:input>
      > <wsdl:output>
      > <soap:body namespace="urn:MyApp" use="literal"/>
      > </wsdl:output>
      > </wsdl:operation>
      > ...
      > </wsdl:binding>
      > <wsdl:service name="MyApp">
      > <wsdl:port binding="tns:MyAppBinding" name="MyAppPort">
      > <soap:address location="http://localhost:8082"/>
      > </wsdl:port>
      > </wsdl:service>
      > </wsdl:definitions>
      > One everything was all nice and fully-qualified, it seemed to work
      fine in .NET 1.x
      > I'm currently playing with it on the new beta of 2.0, but I think
      it's all good there too
      > Issac
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: Maurice McCabe
      > To: soaplite@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:44 PM
      > Subject: RE: [soaplite] SOAP::Lite server with .NET client -
      SOAPAction woes
      > I have created a .NET client that talks to a SOAP::Lite server
      (using simple and complex types in either direction)
      > > SOAP::Serializer::envelope: Client SOAPAction shall match
      'uri#method' if
      > > present (got 'urn:MyApp#Method)
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: jgr@p... [mailto:jgr@p...] On Behalf Of Klaus Guenter
      > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 4:43 AM
      > To: soaplite@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [soaplite] SOAP::Lite server with .NET client -
      SOAPAction woes
      > Hi!
      > On Tuesday 13 July 2004 15:44, Issac Goldstand wrote:
      > > If I explicitly declare the SOAPAction in the WSDL, I get:
      > > SOAP::Serializer::envelope: Client SOAPAction shall match
      'uri#method' if
      > > present (got 'urn:MyApp#Method)
      > The syntax for urn: is different in .NET. AFAIR s/#/\//;
      > But there is more to check when connecting to .NET, namely the
      encoding style,
      > IIRC. The MS Knowledge Base has an article that describes
      > SOAP::Lite Clients to .NET Servers and vice versa.
      > HTH,
      > Klaus
      > --
      > People often find it easier to be a result of the past than a
      cause of
      > the future.
      > -
      > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soaplite/
      > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > soaplite-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
      of Service.
    • Show all 8 messages in this topic